Most active managers fail to beat their benchmarks. This is a key selling point for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) if you can't beat the market, you may as well track it. But a recent study by Morgan Stanley shows you can't always depend on ETFs to deliver the market return either. In 2009, the average US ETF underperformed its index by 1.25% in 2009, from 0.52% in 2008. Management fees account for just 0.3% of this gap. So what's going on?
To be fair to ETFs, part of the divergence is down to a mathematical optical illusion. Fees are levied daily within ETFs. So the tracking difference will always seem larger in rising markets and smaller in falling ones. So 2009's huge rally accounts for some of the rise in tracking error. But it's also partly down to ETFs moving into more esoteric areas of the market.
Take, for example, iShares' benchmark MSCI Emerging Markets fund, one of the largest American ETFs. The fund returned 71.8% in 2009, compared to 78.5% for the index. But the Europe-listed version of the iShares fund did a little better, returning 75.4%, while db x-trackers' MSCI Emerging Markets ETF returned 77.5%.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Why? The iShares ETFs, which track the index by physically owning the underlying stocks, held a lot of "offshore" emerging market shares ADRs and GDRs particularly in the US version. The performance of ADRs and GDRs last year differed from the locally listed shares used in the index calculation, so the fund and benchmark returns didn't match up.
The db x-trackers fund, on the other hand, uses swap-based replication, where the parent bank guarantees the index return to the fund (less fees). This should mean better tracking, though at the expense of some risk exposure to the bank involved.
Tracking error is not all one way. Some ETFs beat their indices. This can happen because of differing tax treatment of dividends between fund and index, or because the fund is making extra returns from another source, such as lending its stocks (although this isn't risk-free).
So check out an ETF's tracking ability before you buy. Simply look at the issuer's website and compare the fund return with the index return over different periods. Funds tracking popular benchmarks, such as the FTSE 100, S&P 500 and Euro Stoxx 50, should have few problems. But for less liquid or more exotic areas emerging markets, corporate bonds, or small-caps tracking error could be a real concern.
Paul Amery is editor of www.indexuniverse.eu , the top source of news and analysis on Europe's ETF and index fund market.
-
How much tax do I pay on investments?Are you worried about taxes biting into your profits? We explain how much you’ll pay and look at ways to keep more of what you earn through investing
-
Inheritance tax receipts surge by 10% – can you reduce your IHT liabilities?Bereaved families are paying more than ever in inheritance tax, but there are some ways to reduce your bill.
-
What is an index fund?Glossary We outline everything you need to know about index funds, from what they are and how to buy them, to the things to consider before you do so.
-
Low-cost index funds for simple investingTips Index funds are an easy, low-cost way for investors to invest in a sector or asset class. Here’s a selection of the cheapest passive tracker funds on the market right now
-
A core US fund that should be part of every portfolioAnalysis The UK market’s recovery might not be here to stay. America offers a compelling alternative, says Max King.
-
Why actively managed funds don’t outperform in bear marketsAdvice The idea that active funds should outperform in bear markets is logical and compelling. Sadly, it’s also wrong
-
Here’s why the idea of a bubble in passive investing is flawedTutorials The idea of passive investing – buying a fund that simply tracks an index – has been growing rapidly in recent years. Some say it's in a bubble. John Stepek disagrees.
-
The trouble with index-tracking fundsTutorials Index-tracking funds are great, cheap alternatives to their overpriced active cousins. But they aren’t flawless, says John Stepek.
-
Three funds to buy to get exposure to oil
Features One of the best ways to gain exposure to emerging-market growth is through an oil play, says Paul Amery. Here, he tips three London-listed exchange-traded funds to buy now.
-
When to use a currency-hedged ETF
Features Last week, iShares launched Europe's first currency-hedged exchange-traded funds. They are a valuable addition to investors' armoury - but when should you use them? Paul Amery explains.
