Sino Forest felled by fraud claims
Sino Forest's share price has plummeted amid accusations of substantially overstating the value and size of their forestry holdings.
Shares in Chinese forestry group Sino Forest (SF) have fallen by more than 90% on the Toronto market since 2 June, when short seller Carson Block alleged that SF overstated its assets and routed money through a murky web of intermediaries to defraud investors. The company has established an independent committee to look into the matter, with a report expected in three months. This week, billionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson, previously SF's top shareholder, ditched his stake.
What the commentators said
A two-week investigation by Mark MacKinnon and Andy Hoffman of Canada's Globe and Mail suggested that SF "substantially overstated the value and size of its forestry holdings". SF said in its first-quarter report for 2011 that due to a particular agreement it owns over 200,000 hectares in China's Yunnan province. But according to the company on the other end of that deal, the actual figure is far smaller around 14,000.
SF is also "either unable or unwilling to identify the trading partners at the heart of its business", said Dan McCrum in the FT. It's easy to see why Hugh Humfrey of Timberland Investment Resources Europe has always deemed Chinese forestry investments too risky: "we're [worried] about the legal and regulation aspect".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
That evidently applies to plenty of other Chinese companies listed in North America. Chinese stocks on the Toronto exchange have fallen by 30% from their end of April level. In the past six months accounting discrepancies have emerged at 25 New York-listed Chinese firms. They "need to make themselves less muddy and more intelligible", said the Globe and Mail. A good start, added Peter Stein in The Wall Street Journal, would be to allow the US accounting regulator to inspect the work of Chinese accountants, thus facilitating a much closer look at Chinese firms' books. Meanwhile, investors need to keep in mind that poor access to information "comes with the emerging-markets territory".
TRE: C$ 2.38; 12m change -86%
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
-
Investors pulled £4.2bn from equity funds ahead of Budget tax raid
October was the third-worst month on record for fund flows, new figures show, as investors sold assets ahead of the Autumn Budget
By Katie Williams Published
-
What Keir Starmer's ‘Plan for Change’ means for you - six milestones explained
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has set out six milestones that the public can judge the government by - we reveal Labour's top policy targets
By Marc Shoffman Published