Great frauds in history: Tsuyoshi Kikukawa and Olympus

Tsuyoshi Kikukawa who served as managing director, president and chairman of Japanese camera maker Olympus, hid $1.7bn of losses in the firm.

Tsuyoshi Kikukawa was born in 1941 and went on to join Olympus, a firm that mainly specialised in optical instruments, in 1964. Kikukawa championed digital photography and ran the team that released Olympus's first digital camera in 1996. This was a success and digital cameras became key to the business. Kikukawa was then promoted, serving successively as managing director, president and chairman.

What was the scam?

The rise in the Japanese yen in the 1980s created problems for many Japanese technology firms, including Olympus since its costs were in yen and its revenues in dollars. Kikukawa's predecessor, Toshiro Shimoyama, indulged in financial speculation to make up the difference, which resulted in large losses. After changes to Japanese accounting rules made it hard directly to conceal those losses, the company sold the worthless assets to shell companies, which were then bought in 2008 for large amounts of money. This allowed Olympus to write off the losses as "goodwill" (the difference between the cost of acquiring a company and its assets). Around $1.7bn in losses were hidden in this way.

What happened next?

In April 2011, Olympus hired Michael Woodford as its CEO, the firm's first non-Japanese leader. Although a long-time Olympus employee, he was unaware of what the company had been doing. When he heard rumours of irregularities he demanded an explanation. The Olympus board responded by firing him, prompting Woodford to go public with his concerns. The subsequent media firestorm and investigations caused mass resignations of directors and executives. Kikukawa, and two other executives, were convicted of abetting the cover up, but got suspended sentences because they didn't set up the scheme.

Lessons for investors

Between mid-October, when Woodford was fired, and early November, Olympus's shares fell by more than 80%. The news also led to job losses as the firm cut costs. However, despite a subsequent bribery scandal, the stock later made a full recovery. Indeed, even if you had bought in July 2011, when the first rumours were published in the financial press, you would by now have doubled your money, while those brave enough to buy in November would have made more than ten times their investment. This shows that the market can sometimes overreact to scandals.

Recommended

What to do as the age of cheap money and overpriced equities ends
Investment strategy

What to do as the age of cheap money and overpriced equities ends

The age of cheap money, overpriced equities and negative interest rates is over. The great bond bull market is over. All this means you will be losin…
29 Sep 2022
There is light at the end of the tunnel for investors
Sponsored

There is light at the end of the tunnel for investors

Investors are gloomy. But it’s not all bad, says Max King – the mood could be about to shift. You just need to hold your nerve for a little while long…
27 Sep 2022
The hidden cost of employee share schemes
Investment strategy

The hidden cost of employee share schemes

Paying employees in shares comes at a cost to investors – but it isn’t always easy to see how much, says Stephen Clapham.
26 Sep 2022
Investors are still in denial about inflation and interest rates
Global Economy

Investors are still in denial about inflation and interest rates

There are worrying signs that inflation is becoming embedded in the economy, but many investors are struggling to adjust to the new reality.
23 Sep 2022

Most Popular

The best British tech stocks from a thriving sector
Share tips

The best British tech stocks from a thriving sector

Move over, Silicon Valley. Over the past two decades the UK has become one of the main global hubs for tech start-ups. Matthew Partridge explains why,…
29 Sep 2022
Share tips of the week – 30 September
Share tips

Share tips of the week – 30 September

MoneyWeek’s comprehensive guide to the best of this week’s share tips from the rest of the UK's financial pages.
30 Sep 2022
Why everyone is over-reacting to the mini-Budget
Budget

Why everyone is over-reacting to the mini-Budget

Most analyses of the chancellor’s mini-Budget speech have failed to grasp its purpose and significance, says Max King
29 Sep 2022