MPs’ expenses scandal lives on
A decade on from the MPs' expenses scandal and little has changed.
"Nearly a decade ago, in the wake of the expenses scandal, parliament declared itself thoroughly cleaned up," says The Daily Telegraph. It has now been revealed that, following a "series of creeping rule changes", some MPs are able to claim nearly double the amount to which they were previously entitled.
Before 2009, MPs were able to claim up to £24,000 for buying and furnishing a London property. Some were claiming for mortgage interest and, when the properties were sold, avoiding capital gains tax and pocketing the gains. In 2010 it was decided that MPs could claim up to £1,450 a month to rent a second home in London.
Over the years, additional payments for dependent children have become more generous. Today, MPs can claim £5,435 a year for each "dependent" child under 21. As a result, they are "increasingly claiming" that children over 18 who do not live with them are dependents.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The fact that the total amount claimed is edging up to pre-2009 levels should come as "no surprise", says Tom Harris on CapX. Rental costs are frequently higher than an interest-only mortgage. The previous system was "cynically exploited", but we do need a system that doesn't leave MPs "out of pocket" when they're in London. The case for an annual flat rate payment needs to be made. Spending more than necessary on repayments to MPs and on an "expensive and cumbersome" quango (Ipsa) to oversee them is unsustainable.
When dreaming up a new system, we should also consider the effect that the 2009 "public shaming" has had on British politics, says Douglas Murray on UnHerd. It has discouraged the bright, talented people with a variety of "lucrative side careers" from entering politics. The House of Commons today is increasingly full of people who are "timid, limited" career politicians "for whom politics is absolutely everything and who, therefore, have very little to bring to it".
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.
Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.
-
Ofgem proposes new energy tariffs with low or no standing changes
Standing charges have invited public backlash as households battle high energy bills
By Katie Williams Published
-
Google shares bounce on Gemini 2.0 launch
Google has launched the latest version of its Gemini AI platform, and markets have responded positively. Is it time to buy Google shares?
By Dan McEvoy Published