Nato at 70: beginning to show its age?

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation’s 70th anniversary represents a huge achievement. But celebrations are being kept to a single day.

Emily Hohler
By
published
in Features

941-Jens-634

Stoltenberg is hosting "modest" celebrations
(Image credit: © 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP)

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's 70th anniversary represents a huge achievement, says The Economist. The average lifespan of collective defence alliances is 15 years. However, celebrations have been limited to a "modest" one-day gathering of foreign ministers on Thursday.

Although Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg met with US president Donald Trump on Tuesday, Nato is keen to avoid a repeat of the bruising confrontations at its summit in Brussels last July, when Trump berated allies for "not pulling their weight" (in 2014, Nato's 29 members set a target of 2% of GDP on defence spending by 2024, which few, including Germany, have done much about). Despite Trump's "bolshiness", bipartisan support for Nato in Congress is strong and defence spending in Europe has risen on his watch.

Nevertheless, the idea ofan EU army is now being mooted by European leaders including Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel, says Peter Ricketts in The Guardian. This is unwise. The US protected European allies during the cold war, helped stop ethnic cleansing in the Balkans and after two decades of "discretionary wars" in Afghanistan and elsewhere, Nato is back home prioritising security in the face of Russian aggression. The EU "could not begin to substitute" for US military assets.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Russia's neighbours may be enthusiastic about Nato, but their "anti-Russian zeal" is an embarrassment for Germans eager to cut energy deals with Moscow, says Walter Russell Mead in The Wall Street Journal.

The truth is, the US has been "backing away" from Nato for nearly a decade; China is a growing concern. Turkey's plans to buy Russian missiles and Italy's support for China's Belt and Road initiative also signal the "diminishing value" placed on Nato. "Without a change of heart" from its most important members, the outlook for Nato is poor. In Moscow and Beijing "conclusions are being drawn".

Emily Hohler
Emily Hohler
Politics editor

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.

Latest