This article is taken from our FREE daily investment email Money Morning.
Every day, MoneyWeek's executive editor John Stepek and guest contributors explain how current economic and political developments are affecting the markets and your wealth, and give you pointers on how you can profit.
We’ll have a new podcast (maybe even more than one) for you next week, but in the meantime if you missed last week’s, you should listen to it now – Merryn talks to Bernard Connolly, economist and author of The Rotten Heart of Europe, the 1995 book that got him fired from his job at the European Commission. It might not do your blood pressure any good (regardless of the side of the Brexit divide on which you fall), but you will find it fascinating.
As always, if you have any questions that you’d like Merryn and I to address, please do send them in to email@example.com. Put “Questions for the podcast” in the subject line and we’ll see what we can do.
If you missed any of this week’s Money Mornings, catch up now.
And subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine – it’s even better than Money Morning.
This week I’ve written a cover story on the slow demise of the US dollar. Could the dollar lose its place as reserve currency? What would have to happen first? What could replace it? And what would it mean for your portfolio? For the answers, you’ll have to subscribe – but you get your first six issues free, so what are you waiting for?
And now, over to the charts.
The yield curve (here’s a reminder of what it is) perked up ever so slightly this week, which is probably because of two things – firstly, hopes for a deal between the US and China picked up a little, but secondly and probably more importantly, US GDP data came in better than expected.
The chart below shows the difference (the “spread”) between what it costs the US government to borrow money over ten years and what it costs over two. Once this number turns negative, the yield curve has inverted which almost always signals a recession (although perhaps not for up to two years).
The further this line moves away from zero, the less nervous investors are feeling and the more keen they’ll be to take on more risk (ie drive asset prices higher). This is only one week, but the Fed will be keen to see this keep moving in this direction.
(The gap between the yield on the ten-year US Treasury and that on the two-year, going back three months)
Gold (measured in dollar terms) had a tougher week this week. That’s partly because investors have been getting excited about it again, which with gold, tends to be a warning sign. But it’s also a sign that investor risk appetite is returning. When that happens, they don’t want to be in something boring and “safe” like gold – they want to invest in exciting things like stocks.
(Gold: three months)
The US dollar index – a measure of the strength of the dollar against a basket of the currencies of its major trading partners – slipped a fraction this week before rebounding on the GDP data.
(DXY: three months)
The ten-year yields on the world’s major developed market bonds were all slightly higher, as readings below from the US, Japan and Germany show (Japanese yields are almost in positive territory again!).
It’ll be very interesting to see if and when US yields can get back above 3% this year. I suspect the headline story on recession fears would start to change then.
(Ten-year US Treasury yield: three months)
(Ten-year Japanese government bond yield: three months)
(Ten-year bund yield: three months)
Copper maintained its recent winning streak. Again, when you look at the action of emerging markets, Chinese stocks, and the copper price, you have to question whether investors are really right to fear a slowdown.
(Copper: three months)
The Aussie dollar – our favourite indicator of the state of the Chinese economy – rallied, but then fell back to where it ended last week, as Aussie construction activity missed hopes, while the dollar was given a boost by the aforementioned GDP data.
(Aussie dollar vs US dollar exchange rate: three months)
Cryptocurrency bitcoin couldn’t maintain its recent surge, and has slipped back into a range.
(Bitcoin: ten days)
The four-week moving average of weekly US jobless claims fell back this week, to 229,000, although weekly claims rose to 225,000, higher than expected.
Based on a limited sample of data (recessions are relatively rare), David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff has pointed out that US stocks typically don’t peak until after the moving average of jobless claims has hit a low for the cycle. On average, a recession follows about a year later.
The most recent trough came on 15 September, at 206,000. If that was the bottom, it implies that the market has already peaked (in early October, at around 2,950 for the S&P 500), and that a recession may follow this year or in 2020.
It’s looking more and more likely. But let’s not judge too quickly.
(US jobless claims, four-week moving average: since January 2016)
The oil price (as measured by Brent crude, the international/European benchmark) slipped earlier this week as Donald Trump took it upon himself to warn Opec and markets in general that the price was climbing too high. However, while the president might be able to throw the occasional spanner into the works, his influence is limited. By the end of the week, the price was climbing back towards its most recent high.
(Brent crude oil: three months)
Internet giant Amazon edged higher this week – it’s still not back in full-blown bullish mode yet though.
(Amazon: three months)
Electric car group Tesla rallied sharply this week, partly because Elon Musk (who seems to revel in annoying the US regulator, the SEC) tweeted that the company would have a big announcement to make on Thursday.
It then declared that it would finally be selling its Model 3 car in the US for $35,000, a long-time target which is seen as the key to making the car truly mass-market. It’s also moved to selling the cars online only, shutting its showrooms, while offering an effective week-long test drive period, after which you can return the car for a refund.
It’s a pretty compelling sales technique – although the fact that Tesla will now not make a profit in the first quarter also suggest it may be an expensive one.
(Tesla: three months)