Book in the news: the sham do-gooding of the billionaire class
Book review: Winners Take All Philanthrocapitalism is a sham, argues Anand Giridharadas – a cover for dodging taxes or pushing causes dear to the hearts of the super-rich.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
The Elite Charade ofChanging the World
Allen Lane (£12.99)
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
"Philanthrocapitalism" is the idea that, "by applying their moneymaking acumen to social investing," business leaders can help "rid the world of disease, want, exclusion and ignorance," says Edward Luce in the FT. Anand Giridharadas argues that this is a sham, a cover for dodging taxes or pushing causes dear to the hearts of the super-rich. Rather than benefiting society, "modern philanthropy largely reinforces the world as it is".
Giridharadas has "embedded himself in the world he writes about", says Joseph Stiglitz in The New York Times, and he avoids bombast to make a "tactful and subtle" argument. This allows him to present "a devastating portrait of a whole class, one easier to satirise than to reform". It's hard to disagree with his conclusion that "democracy and high levels of inequality of the kind that have come to characterise the US are simply incompatible".
His skewering of those who "exalt their own goodness while making money from dubious business practices" makes "for entertaining reading", says Bethany McLean in The Washington Post.
The problem is his solution. Giving more money to governments is something many readers "cynical about the private sector but also versed enough in history to be cynical about governments"might disagree with.
Listen to Merryn Somerset Webb in conversation with Anand Giridharadas on the MoneyWeek Podcast.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Barings Emerging Europe trust bounces back from Russia woesBarings Emerging Europe trust has added the Middle East and Africa to its mandate, delivering a strong recovery, says Max King
-
How a dovish Federal Reserve could affect youTrump’s pick for the US Federal Reserve is not so much of a yes-man as his rival, but interest rates will still come down quickly, says Cris Sholto Heaton