Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
A one-sided play that backfires spectacularly
Theatre review: I’m Not Running David Hare's play sets up some interesting questions, but it fails to provide any answers.
Ran at the Lytletton in the National Theatre until 31 January
In David Hare's play, independent MP Pauline Gibson (Sin Brooke) faces the dilemma of whether or not to challenge insider Jack Gould (Alex Hassell) for the open leadership of the Labour Party. The situation is complicated by the fact that, as we learn in a series of flashbacks, Gibson and Gould have history. Not only were they romantically involved as students, but Gould was involved in the hospital closure that prompted Gibson to leave medicine and go into politics.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
The first half of the play sets up some interesting questions. Is it better for policy to be made by experts from Westminster,or by those on the frontline?Is genuine political change a result of the actions of individuals or that of a wider movement? Has the political class become too hereditary and isolated from the rest of society?
Hare seems uninterested in providing any answers, however. Worse, he seems to forget the rule about making the opposing viewpoint in a debate as strong as possible, and opts to turn Gould into a caricature. Indeed, one gets the impression that Hare hasn't quite got over a certain former prime minister. The one-sidedness backfires by the end of the play you end up having a lot of sympathy for Gould, especially compared with his overly righteous rival.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
