Efficient markets theory and tennis

Why aren’t markets as efficient as theory tells us they should be? Tennis odds give us a clue, says John Stepek.

Novak Djokovic: the favourite doesn't always win

This content is subject to copyright.

We all know that markets are not as efficient as academic theorists would like them to be. A wide range of "anomalies" have been found that mean there are certain strategies that, over the long run, should (if history remains any guide) beat the wider market. These include momentum (buy stuff that goes up, sell what goes down); value (buy what's cheap and sell it once it's no longer cheap); and small caps (smaller companies beat larger companies over time). The question is why do these phenomena persist? Why are they not arbitraged away once investors find them?

Advertisement - Article continues below

An inkling of an answer might come from the tennis courts. In a new paper (Do Expectations Reflect Information Reliability? Evidence from odds on tennis matches), Constantinos Antoniou of Warwick Business School and Christos Mavis of the University of Surrey looked at betting odds on more than 9,000 tennis matches between 2005 and 2014. They wanted to examine how bookmakers made use of available information to set the odds of victory for each player.

The researchers point out that "the diagnostic value of information depends both on its content and its reliability". Professional tennis players have an official ranking, so you'll always know who the "best" player is in each match. However, the "reliability" of this information depends on the type of match being played. Grand Slam matches are played to the best of five (so a minimum of three games), whereas ATP World Tour matches are best of three (a minimum of two games). As the researchers note, "since highly skilled players are more likely to win any single point, they should win longer matches more frequently, as more points are generally played". In other words, there's a higher chance around 7%, as it turns out of the more highly ranked player winning a Grand Slam match than an ATP match. In turn, that means bookmakers should offer correspondingly worse odds. Yet they don't. Bookies consistently underestimate the chances of higher-ranked players winning Grand Slam matches, and so make lower profits on these matches overall.

What's interesting from a markets point of view is that, if even professional bookies often viewed as the least fallible of all forecasters suffer from "information reliability neglect" and fail to "price in" useful, publicly available data, then it suggests there's a simple explanation for persistent anomalies. Quite simply, "investors fail to recognise information reliability and don't price stocks as strongly as they should", suggests Antoniou. Oh, and if you fancy a punt on the tennis, the lesson seems to be: stick to Grand Slams and bet on the favourite every time.




The British equity market is shrinking

British startups are abandoning public stockmarkets and turning to deep-pocketed Silicon Valley venture capitalists for their investment needs.
8 Nov 2019

There are lots of reasons to be bearish – but you should stick with the bulls

There are plenty of reasons to be gloomy about the stockmarkets. But the trend remains up, says Dominic Frisby. And you don’t want to bet against the …
17 Jul 2019

Good news on jobs scares US stockmarkets

June brought the best monthly US jobs growth of the year, but stockmarkets were not best pleased.
11 Jul 2019

Trade-war ceasefire boosts stockmarkets

Stockmarkets sighed with relief after the G20 summit in Japan brought a handshake between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.
4 Jul 2019

Most Popular

EU Economy

Here’s why investors should care about the EU’s plan to tackle Covid-19

The EU's €750bn rescue package makes a break-up of the eurozone much less likely. John Stepek explains why the scheme is such a big deal, and what it …
28 May 2020
Industrial metals

Governments’ money-printing mania bodes well for base metals

Money is being printed like there is no tomorrow. Much of it will be used to pay for infrastructure projects – and that will be good for metals, says …
27 May 2020

In support of active fund management

We’re fans of passive investing here at MoneyWeek. But active fund management has its place too, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
25 May 2020