Carillion’s collapse should prompt better rules for PFI
Calls are mounting to make changes to the private finance initiative (PFI) following the collapse of Carillion.
Business Secretary Greg Clark is "trying to get on the front foot" after criticism of the government's handling of the Carillion crisis, says Jim Pickard in the Financial Times.
He wants to fast-track an investigation into the conduct of the firm's directors and has asked the Financial Conduct Authority to look into the preparation of Carillion's accounts. But it may be a bit late to step up now. The fact that ministers continued to award the firm contracts after its "financial woes were made public" last July promises to be politically very awkward.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn says the collapse proves that the private sector shouldn't be involved in running Britain's public services, say George Parker and Gemma Tetlow in the same paper. Even David Willetts, a former Treasury official and "key promoter" of the private finance initiative (PFI), concedes that the Carillion collapse shows the risk is not always genuinely transferred to the private sector, since the government has an obligation to maintain public services.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
At least Carillion hasn't been bailed out, says Andrew Lilico in The Daily Telegraph. That shows that capitalism is working, by "weeding out inefficient and obsolete companies, management and working practices". We want it to be as easy as possible for PFI contract-holders to fail, so that owners run them with maximum efficiency.
That misses the point of what happened, says Simon Jenkins in The Guardian. Carillion's fate reveals "rampant indiscipline in the contracts". A combination of "favouritism, cost escalation, excessive risk, obscene remuneration and reckless indebtedness" led to the firm's demise. Finding the "ideal mix of public-sector loyalty and private-sector incentive" isn't easy, but there should be clear rules, limiting, for example, "market dominance, debt and remuneration". This debacle should prompt "a review of how privatisation is working".
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.
Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.
-
Energy bills to rise by 1.2% in January 2025
Energy bills are set to rise 1.2% in the New Year when the latest energy price cap comes into play, Ofgem has confirmed
By Dan McEvoy Published
-
Should you invest in Trainline?
Ticket seller Trainline offers a useful service – and good prospects for investors
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published