In 2015, a Chinese stockmarket slump rattled global investors. But Chinese bonds are "far more important", says Pete Sweeney on Breakingviews. And it may be "time to start worrying" about them. The key trend in the $9trn fixed-income market recently has been a jump in the ten-year government bond yield, reflecting falling prices. The yield has edged above 4% for the first time in three years.
Corporate debt is priced off state debt, so this implies higher borrowing costs for China's highly indebted companies. The average yield on five-year, triple-A-rated corporate paper, a key gauge of company funding costs, has hit 5.2%, also a three-year high, notes Shen Hong in The Wall Street Journal. Corporate debt accounts for most of the country's huge overall debt pile, worth 269% of GDP now, up from 149% in 2007. The Chinese central bank recently warned of a "Minsky moment" a sudden slide in asset prices following excessive speculation and borrowing. The worry is that a jump in corporate borrowing costs could be the pin that pricks the Chinese bubble.
It may be too soon to panic, however. As Shen Hong points out, growth has slowed a bit of late, which should imply more demand for government bonds, and corporate lending still looks healthy. "The volume of loans going to corporates is still pretty large," according to Chen Kang of CreditQuant Asset Management. The key cause of the recent rise in bond yields has been a government clampdown on speculation and leverage. Regulators have put paid to practices they felt were being abused, such as borrowing for short periods using bond-repurchase agreements.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
More broadly, however, the bond-market tremors are a reminder of how difficult it will be to maintain economic stability and reduce systemic leverage at the same time not least because the financial system is "increasingly intertwined", as Anjani Trivedi says in The Wall Street Journal. The latest rise in borrowing costs for small and medium-sized banks, a result of the state's anti-speculation drive, has prompted them to put more of their money in the non-bank, or "shadow banking" sector, where trust companies and funds offer higher returns.
But the overall amount of money going from banks into the shadow sector has fallen as interest rates have risen. Faced with redemptions, the shadow system has sold some liquid investments such as government bonds to compensate. This kind of knock-on effect could prove hard to contain in a major sell-off. Achieving a soft landing will not be easy.
Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.
After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.
His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.
Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.
Who is the richest person in the world?
The top five richest people in the world have a combined net worth of $825 billion. Who takes the crown for the richest person in the world?
By Vaishali Varu Published
Top 10 stocks with highest growth over past decade - from Nvidia, Microsoft to Netflix, which companies made you the most money?
We reveal the 10 global companies with the biggest returns since 2013. One firm has posted an astonishing 9,870% return, meaning a £1,000 investment would now be worth almost £82,000.
By Ruth Emery Published