Betting on politics: steamers versus drifters
One of the biggest debates in betting is over the merits of “steamers” versus “drifters". Matthew Partridge explains why it's so contentious.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
One of the biggest debates in betting is over the merits of "steamers" versus "drifters". Steamers are bets that dramatically shorten in price: so the implied chances of success go up. Drifters are the reverse, bets where the odds drift out, suggesting that a result or event has become less likely. So if a candidate's odds go from 2/1 (33%) to evens (50%), the bet is a steamer; if the odds move in the opposite direction, it's a drifter.
Those who advocate backing steamers argue that most bookies are unable to monitor each individual market. Instead, they tend to rely on the direction of money to guide their odds.While this is designed to protect them from large losses, it means that they are always one step behind the best bettors. In many markets people gamble with information not available to the general public. If there is a rapid movement it makes sense to follow these insiders.
Supporters of drifters agree that this may have been true long ago. But today, the belief that steamers offer value means that many people blindly follow them, betting on them even when the odds are too short. They also argue that people tend to let their emotions run away with them, overreacting to every piece of bad news. They insist that there is better value to be had by betting on drifters.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
So who's right? All the studies suggest that if you're looking to hold a bet until the event takes place, you're far better off going with the drifters. A 2015 study by Tobias Moskowitz of the University of Chicago that looked at Las Vegas bookmakers for baseball, American football, hockey and basketball, found that betting on outcomes where the odds had shortened would have increased your losses. Studies of horse racing by both Betfair and Racing Post also suggest that backing drifters can make you money.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Could you get cheaper loans under ‘significant’ FCA credit proposals?The Financial Conduct Authority has launched a consultation which could lead to better access to credit for consumers and increase competition across the market, according to experts.
-
8 of the best properties for sale with minstrels’ galleriesThe best properties for sale with minstrels’ galleries – from a 15th-century house in Kent, to a four-storey house in Hampstead, comprising part of a converted, Grade II-listed former library