Bill Gross: Trump's unrealistic growth target
The growth rates of 3% per year that Donald Trump is promising to deliver in the US are unrealistic, says bond fund manager Bill Gross.
The growth rates of 3% per year that Donald Trump is promising to deliver in the US are unrealistic, says bond fund manager Bill Gross of Janus Capital. They "belong to a bygone era". Potential growth today is much lower, due in part to weak productivity. While innovation "may be changing the face of finance and investment", this hasn't filtered through to the wider economy. "Productivity has flatlined over the past five years."
An ageing population could also hit demand, "since older people don't buy as many goods and services as younger people", but need "much more healthcare". Gross thinks America and Europe could ultimately end up following Japan, where the high proportion of elderly people has slashed growth and expanded debt. This represents a "problem for both growth and capitalism".
While central banks around the world continue to keep interest rates low to boost growth, "the price of credit is as low as it can possibly go", so it's hard to see how they could fall further.Even in the US, 30-year government bonds yield barely more than 2% a year. These policies may be encouraging people to "stuff their money into their mattresses, instead of productively investing it".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
With shares also expensive, the combination of high valuation and low growth means the trade-off between risk and reward is not in investors' favour. Indeed, "instead of buying low and selling high, you're buying high and crossing your fingers". Even in a best-case scenario, "low returns are inevitable" and there is a good chance they could end up being negative for both bonds and shares.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Ben studied modern languages at London University's Queen Mary College. After dabbling unhappily in local government finance for a while, he went to work for The Scotsman newspaper in Edinburgh. The launch of the paper's website, scotsman.com, in the early years of the dotcom craze, saw Ben move online to manage the Business and Motors channels before becoming deputy editor with responsibility for all aspects of online production for The Scotsman, Scotland on Sunday and the Edinburgh Evening News websites, along with the papers' Edinburgh Festivals website.
Ben joined MoneyWeek as website editor in 2008, just as the Great Financial Crisis was brewing. He has written extensively for the website and magazine, with a particular emphasis on alternative finance and fintech, including blockchain and bitcoin.
As an early adopter of bitcoin, Ben bought when the price was under $200, but went on to spend it all on foolish fripperies.
-
Why is the US economy pulling ahead of Europe?
The US economy is trouncing comparable rich-world countries, enjoying higher growth and productivity. What is it doing so right?
By Simon Wilson Published
-
Should you add natural gas to your portfolio?
Few investors have noticed, but natural gas has embarked on a bull run
By Dominic Frisby Published