Populist challengers are as bad as the elite

Published by Head of Zeus, £18.99

Buy at Amazon

Douglas Carswell has hadan eventful few years. After moving from the Conservatives to Ukip inAugust 2014, he managedto hold his seat at both thesubsequent by-election, andthe 2015 general election. However, his libertarianviews sat uneasily with NigelFarage's populist approach,and the two have clashedover a wide range of issues,culminating in his recentdecision to quit Ukip andbecome an independent MP.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Carswell's new book, Rebel,is an attempt to outline hispolitical philosophy. In it, he arguesthat the current establishment, bothpolitical and business, is corrupt anddeliberately constructed so as to avoidpublic scrutiny. This isn't a particularlynew idea: you can hear variations on thistheme from everyone from Beppe Grilloin Italy to Donald Trump in America.However, the big twist is that Carswellthinks that the populist challengers to the status quo, such as Trump, Grilloand Farage, are just as bad as the elitethat they are trying to replace.

Indeed,Carswell is particularly scathing aboutthe Ukip leader. Rather than trying tochange, or at least reform, the system,these politicians are only concernedwith trying to grab more power for themselves, he says, using fear andhysteria to further their own interests.

Instead of trying to replace the peopleat the top, Carswell thinks that we needto make some fundamental changes tothe way that we regulate business andfinance. We need to avoid following theexample of medieval Venice and early modern China, where entrepreneurialactivity and businesses ended up beingenmeshed in a web of regulation designedto maintain the elite's strangleholdon power. This led to stagnation anddecline, while countries that stayed opento innovation, such as 16th-centuryHolland and 19th-century Britain,became economic superpowers.

This is all heady stuff. But look closelyand much of Carswell's programmeis standard libertarian fare, such asdismantling the welfare state, replacingpublic services with personal savingsaccounts, and breaking up the BBC.

Such policies would accentuate inequalitywithout stimulating enterprise, andwould make the oligarchy even morepowerful. His idea of growing UK-UStrade by accepting US standards alsodeliberately overlooks the fact that USstandards are much weaker than ours.Finally, some of the stranger ideas heputs forward include ending limitedliability for bankers and having multiplecurrencies circulate in the UK at thesame time. These proposals are simplyunworkable in a modern economy.