The women’s pensions crisis
The gender gap between men and women when it comes to expected retirement income widened again last year. Natalie Stanton reports.
The gender gap between men and women when it comes to expected retirement income widened again last year, after shrinking for a number of years, according to a new study by insurer Prudential. Women retirees currently have an income of £14,450, compared to an average annual income for men of £19,850. Only 40% of women were confident that their retirement savings would provide a sufficient income to enjoy a comfortable life, compared to 60% of men.
This follows a separate study by Scottish Widows last year, which found that a quarter of women are saving nothing for their retirement, in part due to a worrying lack of awareness about the subject: some 43% of women reported they have little or no understanding of individual pension savings. But it's not just about awareness: many women are much less able to save due to lower excess income.
A quarter of women earn less than £14,000 per year, compared with 14% of men, says Scottish Widows. And many mothers face a "triple cost", according to women's rights charity the Fawcett Society. Time taken off for maternity leave cuts many mothers' income and pension contributions. This is exacerbated when they return to work on reduced hours. Lastly, childcare costs put more pressure on their finances.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It doesn't help that many women will lose out on receiving a full £155.65 state pension because they opted out of paying the additional state pension top-up, resulting in their under-paying National Insurance during their working lives. And even for those who did contribute, many women born in the 1950s will be left worse than expected by the government's decision to bring forward the increase in their retirement age from 60 to 66.
2016 | £14,450 | £19,850 | £5,400 |
2015 | £14,300 | £19,100 | £4,800 |
2014 | £12,200 | £18,850 | £6,650 |
2013 | £11,750 | £18,250 | £6,500 |
2012 | £12,250 | £18,000 | £5,750 |
2011 | £12,850 | £19,400 | £6,550 |
2010 | £12,150 | £19,600 | £7,450 |
Source - Prudential's Class of... retirement research 2008 to 2016*Rounded to nearest £50 |
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Natalie joined MoneyWeek in March 2015. Prior to that she worked as a reporter for The Lawyer, and a researcher/writer for legal careers publication the Chambers Student Guide.
She has an undergraduate degree in Politics with Media from the University of East Anglia, and a Master’s degree in International Conflict Studies from King’s College, London.
-
Water companies blocked from using customer money to pay “undeserved” bonuses
The regulator has blocked three water companies from using billpayer money to pay £1.5 million in exec bonuses
By Katie Williams Published
-
Will the Bitcoin price hit $100,000?
With Bitcoin prices trading just below $100,000, we explore whether the cryptocurrency can hit the milestone.
By Dan McEvoy Published