EU serves up more fudge on bank stress tests
There were no nasty surprises in the latest European bank stress tests. But there is the usual whiff of “eurofudge” about the results.
There were no nasty surprises in the latest European bank stress tests. Banks now have far more money set aside to cover potential losses. The tests' adverse scenario projected a decline in GDP of 1.7% in 2015-2018, worse than the 1% drop seen in 2008-2011.
Ireland had the lowest average ratio of capital to risk-weighted overall assets, says The Economist: 5.2%. Italy's was 6.5%, fuelling concern over Italian lenders' long-term solvency. No state had a negative ratio, which implies systemic insolvency. In 2014, several did.
Still, there is the usual whiff of "eurofudge" in these results. The tests didn't model the impact of a long period of low or negative bond yields, which undermine profitability. The adverse scenario was based on long-term yields spiking (implying falling bond prices).
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
That seems unlikely to occur soon in a world of zero interest rates, says The Economist. The tests also only looked at 53 banks, compared with 2014's 123. Finally, banks from the struggling economies of Greece, Portugal and Cyprus were excluded, thus automatically skewing the overall picture.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.
After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.
His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.
Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.
-
What happens if you can’t pay your tax bill, and what is "Time to Pay"?
Millions are due to file their tax return this Friday as the self-assessment deadline closes. Though the nightmare is not over until you pay the taxman what you owe - or face a penalty. But what happens if you can't afford to pay HMRC your tax bill, and what is "Time to Pay"?
By Kalpana Fitzpatrick Published
-
What does Rachel Reeves’s plan for growth mean for UK investors?
Rachel Reeves says she is going “further and faster” to kickstart the UK economy, but investors are unlikely to be persuaded
By Katie Williams Published