Active managers versus the bear

Active fund managers won't save you when stockmarkets plummet, says Sarah Moore. So buy a decent bear-market fund instead.

A frequently trotted out justificationfor paying expensive fees for activelymanaged funds is that active managerscome to the fore during bear markets.It's too much (it seems) to expect them tokeep up with indices during stockmarketrallies and volatile market periods. Butwhen a downturn comes, while passivefunds plunge with the underlying market,active managers can offer some security,upping their cash reserves and movinginto more defensive positions. That'swhen you'll be thankful you handedall that money to your beaming fundmanager, as your passive-investor friendstear their hair out. Or so the story goes.

But as with many tales told to justifypaying active fees, it's simply not true, asnew research from Morningstar, based onperformance during the recent downturn,reminds us. John Rekenthaler comparedthe returns of US actively managed funds(large-, mid- and small-cap) from May2015 to 15 January 2016 to that of therelevant Russell (US stockmarket) index.For each size of fund, he looked at threecategories: growth, value and "blend" (ahybrid of the two).

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Sarah is MoneyWeek's investment editor. She graduated from the University of Southampton with a BA in English and History, before going on to complete a graduate diploma in law at the College of Law in Guildford. She joined MoneyWeek in 2014 and writes on funds, personal finance, pensions and property.