Europe's leaders say that Sunday's Greek referendum is a de facto vote on the euro. But Athens insists that it is just about one specific offer. Meanwhile, the ballot paper itself is causing confusion, says Matthew Partridge.
What's going on?
The Greek government has said that refusal will not necessarily lead to Greece's ejection from the euro. Instead, they argue that the Troika (ECB, IMF and the European Commission) will simply have to offer another deal. The Greek finance minister has insisted that Greece cannot leave, threatening to use legal action to delay any attempts to force it to do so.
In response, virtually all eurozone leaders, including those in Italy and Spain, have warned that a no vote would lead to Greece quitting the Euro.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Who's right?
However, if Greece was ejected from the euro it would lose any influence it has over the ECB, without gaining the ability to set interest rates or print money itself. Even if Greece was able to remain within the system, the ECB could shut down Greece's banking system by refusing to extend any more liquidity assistance. Even with existing capital controls in place, Greek banks would only remain solvent for five days.
And the ballot paper?
That's a heck of a mouthful, which is one of the criticisms levelled at the ballot paper. The other is thedecision to put the "No" option above the "Yes" option, which is seen as an attempt to influence voters.
Are these criticisms justifed?
But Katie Ghose, the chief executive of the UK's Electoral Reform Society, says that "the UK's 1998 Good Friday Agreement referendum question was notoriously complex, but people knew the underlying choice". If the Greek government had proposed a simpler question it would be criticised for not being precise enough.
That said, the complexity of the question also leaves the resultwhatever the outcome looking a lot lessclean-cutand open to interpretation by the Greek government than perhaps the rest of Europe would like.
