Unpicking the dividend tax tangle

Dividend tax rules can appear among the most daunting, says Cris Sholto Heaton. But the upshot of many of these rules are simpler than you think.

Few people enjoy thinking about taxes. But if you asked investors to pick the tax rules that baffle them most, dividend taxes would probably top the list. A thicket of notional rates, tax credits, effective rates, withholding taxes and other jargon, dividend taxes seem to be designed to be as incomprehensible as possible. Yet the upshot of most of these rules is simpler than it seems.

In the UK, dividend income is taxed at special dividend tax rates that are lower than normal income tax rates. Basic-rate taxpayers pay a 10% rate, higher-rate taxpayers pay 32.5% and top-rate taxpayers pay 37.5%. However, dividends come with a notional tax credit of 10%. This offsets some or all of the tax you'd otherwise pay on the dividend.

So the effective rate of tax (what you actually pay on the cash dividend you receive) is reduced to nothing for basic-rate taxpayers, 25% for higher-rate taxpayers and 30.56% for top-rate taxpayers.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Most people assume that the dividend tax credit means that 10% tax has been deducted from the dividend before it reaches you, and so even non-taxpayers have paid some tax on their dividends.But while it's common for tax to be deducted from dividends in other countries (this is known as a withholding tax), this is not the way of the UK system.

The tax credit doesn't relate to any tax that's been deducted from your dividend. In the past, there was a tax that companies paid based on the value of the dividends they distributed, called advance corporation tax (ACT). The rate of the tax credit was linked to the rate of ACT.

But ACT was abolished in 1999, partly because it encouraged companies to favour paying dividends over reinvesting profits. Since then, the tax credit has been an entirely notional concept and one that causes a great deal of confusion.

The great Isa tax myth

That's partly because you used to be able to reclaim the 10% tax credit within an Isa or pension. For pensions, this right was abolished in 1997, while for Isas it lasted until 2004.

However, since the tax credit no longer relates to any real tax payment, the fact that you can no longer reclaim it doesn't mean that your dividends are being taxed.

Indeed, since you were able to reclaim the credit in an Isa for five years after the tax it was linked to ACT was abolished, the fact is that the tax credit reclaimhad ultimately evolved into a kind of perk rather than a rebate of any real tax paid. In practice, dividends received in Isas and pensions are still completely free of income tax.

Cross-border complications

But in 2008 the rules changed and dividends from most overseas firms became entitled to the tax credit as well. So the tax due on foreign dividends now works in the same way as for UK dividends.

However, since many foreign governments deduct withholding taxes from the dividend before it's paid to you, this means that you could end up being taxed twice. For example, if the foreign government withholds 25% tax on dividends and you are a higher-rate taxpayer, you could end up losing half your dividend to tax.

To avoid this, you can offset some of the withholding tax deducted from your dividend against your UK tax liability. But this isn't entirely straightforward.

The UK has a double taxation agreement with many other countries and these usually specify the maximum withholding tax that can be deducted from dividends paid to UK citizens. This is usually lower than the headline rate of withholding tax.

For example, if a country normally levies 25% withholding tax, UK citizens may be entitled to a reduced rate of 15%. Unfortunately, few countries allow your dividends to be paid at the reduced withholding tax rate. Instead, they'll be taxed as normal and you need to reclaim the excess. Some countries make this process relatively easy, while some seem to go out of their way to dissuade investors from doing it.

Regrettably, whether you manage to reclaim the extra withholding tax or not, the amount that you can offset against your UK tax liability will be capped at the reduced rate specified in the double taxation agreement. So if it says 15% and the country normally withholds 25%, your maximum relief will be limited to 15%. That means that our higher-rate taxpayer will still lose 35% to tax unless they manage to reclaim the excess.

The rules for Reits

The PID is paid with 20% tax already deducted. This is a real deduction, not a notional tax credit. They are subject to tax at normal income tax rates. So for a basic-rate taxpayer, there is no further liability. Higher-rate taxpayers will owe a further 20% of the value of the PID (including the amount already deducted), while top-rate taxpayers owe 25%.

Unlike the notional tax credit, the PID deduction can be reclaimed by some investors. These include non-taxpayers and those who hold Reits in an Isa or pension. Your Isa or pension manager should do this for you automatically. Some are set up to get PIDs paid gross, while others reclaim the tax later.

Cris Sholto Heaton

Cris Sholto Heaton is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is especially interested in international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers. He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.

Cris began his career in financial services consultancy at PwC and Lane Clark & Peacock, before an abrupt change of direction into oil, gas and energy at Petroleum Economist and Platts and subsequently into investment research and writing. In addition to his articles for MoneyWeek, he also works with a number of asset managers, consultancies and financial information providers.

He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and the Investment Management Certificate, as well as degrees in finance and mathematics. He has also studied acting, film-making and photography, and strongly suspects that an awareness of what makes a compelling story is just as important for understanding markets as any amount of qualifications.