The verdict on American QE

The Federal Reserve has brought to a close an unprecedented monetary experiment.

An unprecedented monetary experiment came to an end last week. The US Federal Reserve ended the third round of its quantitative easing (QE), or money-printing, programme.

It injected a total of $3.7trn into the US economy by buying government and some private bonds with newly created money. The aim was to bolster lending, both directly through banks and via the reduction in bond yields, or long-term interest rates, from bond purchases.

Moreover, because the money was injected into bond markets, encouraging investors to buy other assets with the cash, rising stock and debt markets would fuel the feel-good factor, further bolstering growth or so it was hoped.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

So did QE help? It's hard to disentangle its impact from other factors the US experienced a nasty fiscal squeeze during much of QE, for instance but it seems fair to conclude that while it probably averted a depression, it hasn't done much more.

The US recovery has been very weak by past standards and the economy only now seems to be reaching escape velocity', or a self-sustaining upswing.

In modern economies, money is created by commercial banks writing loans. After a banking crisis, overextended banks resort to shrinking loans to restore their balance sheets to health.

Falling lending can result in deflation and depression. QE helped temper the credit contraction by artificially boosting the money supply to make up for the decline caused by banks.

But this is damage control, not stimulus. Simply plugging a gap in the economy can't make banks boost their lending much or persuade overextended households and companies to borrow. They have to work their debt off gradually after a financial crisis.

This hangover is a multi-year affair, explaining why overall demand, and hence the overall recovery, has been subdued.

And QE has stored up potential problems for the future. It's not just that many asset markets look bubbly. Fears that all this money printing could lead to a jump in inflation may yet prove justified.

Inflation depends on how fast money moves around the economy (the velocity of money), as well as on how much there is. As demand recovers to pre-crisis levels, velocity will rise, increasing the danger of inflation. It already seems to be making a comeback in America.

Andrew Van Sickle

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.