Darling strikes a blow for the Union

Alistair Darling came out on top in his TV debate with 'Yes' campaign leader Alex Salmond. Emily Hohler reports.

Alex Salmond's campaign for Scottish independence suffered an unexpected setback this week after he lost Tuesday night's TV debate with Alistair Darling, says Simon Johnson in The Daily Telegraph.

The first minister had been the bookmakers' clear favourite and Salmond predicted his opponent would have the 'heebie jeebies' about facing him. In the event, an ICM snap poll handed victory to Darling by 56% to 44%.

Salmond needed to win "resoundingly", given the No campaign's consistent lead in the polls, says Janan Ganesh in the FT. Although the confrontation "was never going to be remembered alongside the Lincoln-Douglas debates" over slavery, something of the essence of each campaign came through during the 100 minutes.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Darling the trained lawyer was "forensic in exposing the technical knottiness of ending the union", if hectoring in tone. Salmond a "first-class politician" "radiated wonder at the quasi-Scandinavian miracle" thatan independent Scotland would become, "but his shallow streak was hard to ignore".

Pressed on the currency, he repeatedly insisted that forfeiting the pound wasn't an option. Darling's achievement was to ignore the advice of thecommentariat to make an emotional case, as the nationalists have done, and to use hard-headed arguments.

It helps that people are "loss-averse", says John McDermott in the FT. The questions asked by the studio audience were "practical and specific": about the pound, free prescriptions, free tuition fees. Darling was also well served by the fact that it is in his nature to challenge assumptions and probe inaccuracies. "He does not do the vision thing well but he does the derision thing nicely."

Darling talked sense, but he didn't go nearly far enough, says Max Hastings in the Daily Mail. He didn't dare say frankly to the audience: "An independent Scotland will be Iceland without the fish, a dependency culture without visible means of support, a basket case bobbing on the remotest beach of Europe."

He didn't, because Salmond mocks the No campaign as "Project Fear", and also because "Scottish pride is affronted if anybody reminds them how meagre is their income-tax base, how feeble is entrepreneurialism north of the border, how drugged on state subsidy their nation has become".

Salmond spoke as if Scotland were Saudi Arabia, "its only problem how to spend vast natural wealth". He said nobody would do a better job of running Scotland than the people who live and work there. "The evidence suggests that this is piffle", but Darling didn't dare contradict him.

Emily Hohler

Emily has extensive experience in the world of journalism. She has worked on MoneyWeek for more than 20 years as a former assistant editor and writer. Emily has previously worked on titles including The Times as a Deputy Features Editor, Commissioning Editor at The Independent Sunday Review, The Daily Telegraph, and she spent three years at women's lifestyle magazine Marie Claire as a features writer for three years, early on in her career. 

On MoneyWeek, Emily’s coverage includes Brexit and global markets such as Russia and China. Aside from her writing, Emily is a Nutritional Therapist and she runs her own business called Root Branch Nutrition in Oxfordshire, where she offers consultations and workshops on nutrition and health.