Construction services firm Carillion's (LSE: CLLN)proposed merger with Balfour Beatty (LSE: BBY) has hit the rocks. Carillion wanted the deal to include Balfour's Parsons Brinckerhoff business, which would bring stable profits and strong cash flow. Balfour Beatty had already put this business up for sale and said "no".
Carillion is a well-managed business and does a good job building things for the government and then looking after them. However, it has struggled to grow its profits organically over the last five years. The company has a record of growing by buying other companies.
During the last decade, it has hoovered up rivals, such as Mowlem and Alfred McAlpine,and benefited from big cost savings by combining them withits own businesses. Without these deals, Carillion's profitswould probably have been a lot lower. Balfour Beatty wouldhave undoubtedly given it the option to do the same again.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Yet, growing by acquisition and mergers is a difficult way tomake shareholders richer and many companies fail to do so.Carillion's shares are not much higher than they were five yearsago. Until it can prove that it is capable of sustainable profitsgrowth from its existing businesses, the market is unlikely toplace a higher value on the stock.
Verdict: avoid
-
Should you invest in UK equities?The FTSE 100 hit a record high this week, but UK equities remain unloved and undervalued compared to their global and US peers. Should you snap them up at a discount?
-
State pension errors: DWP urged to check for mistakes among divorced peopleFormer pensions minister Steve Webb says there are a high number of divorced women on low state pensions. Now MPs want the DWP to check if there were any errors in “potentially underpaying men and women who are divorced”.
