Market milestones mean nothing

The Dow may have passed the 17,000 mark last week, but it's value that really matters.

Andrew Van Sickle
By
published
in News

It's been a good month for big round numbers in the markets. Last week, America's Dow Jones index rose above the 17,000 mark to a new record. The S&P 500 is around 2,000 and Britain's FTSE 100 is expected to hit 7,000 soon. But while these round numbers generate headlines, clearly there is nothing intrinsically significant about them.

We only consider them to be milestones at all because of "our brains' attempts to impose order and assign categories to numbers that vary continuously", says US journalist Carl Bialik.

It's particularly easy for us to latch on to a round, eye-catching number and attach spurious importance to it so it's no wonder many articles have appeared about whether the market can keep going from these levels or not.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

But the fact that we have reached a round number tells us nothing about the future direction of stocks.

What to bear in mind, says Fidelity's Tom Stevenson in The Sunday Telegraph, is that it's all about value, not price. "Try to forget" where an index or share has been, however impressive the figure, and focus on "a tangible valuation measure that's hard to fudge".

One of these, says Stevenson, is the dividend yield. And looking at it suggests there is still good value in the FTSE 100. There are 42 firms offering a yield of more than 3%; 24 paying more than 4%, and eight more than 5%.

That's appealing, compared to getting 2.8% for lending to the government, "with no prospect of that income rising, unlike a dividend".

Andrew Van Sickle
Andrew Van Sickle
Editor, MoneyWeek

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.

Latest