It was more of the same from Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS) today, as it announced its third straight year of profit falls. Underlying profits before tax fell by 3.9% to £623m in the 12 months to 29 March.
The figures are broadly in line with City expectations analysts had forecast profits of between £600m and £630m but that hasn't stopped the stock taking a hit today. The price is down 2.9% to 438p.
In a story that will sound very familiar to investors, the venerable retailer's figures have once again been dented by a poor performance in its general merchandise business which includes clothing.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Like for like sales across the group rose by just 0.2%, but general merchandise fell by 1.4%. M&S blamed "unseasonal conditions" and "high level of promotional activity" price cutting for the drop in clothes sales.
However, there are glimmers of hope. For the first time in three years, the company said, clothing "returned to growth" in the last quarter of the year.
Online also offers hope for clothing sales. Sales at a revamped M&S.com rose by 23% last year. The website accounted for 16% of general merchandise sales this year, compared with 13% the previous year.
Once again, the company has been saved by its performance in food sales. Total sales rose by 4.2%, and like-for-like sales grew by 1.7% the 18th consecutive quarter of growth.
And while other food retailers suffer from price cutting and competition from the likes of Aldi and Lidl, Marks & Spencer is refusing to "join the race to the bottom on price". It's a strategy that, for now at least, seems to be paying off.
Overseas, sales rose by 6.2% to £1.15bn, as the company opened 55 new stores. Sales rose by 15.7% in Asia, and by 3.9% in Europe.
M&S shares are currently trading on a price/earnings ratio of around 15 times.
We said two years ago M&S was "still worth buying" if they could sort out their clothing sales. That's still to happen.
And earlier this year, Ed Bowsher said there was "no way" he'd buy the shares at the then price of 459p, because of its ongoing problems with its womenswear. Today's price is lower, it's true, but with clothing still not performing, is it low enough?
Ben studied modern languages at London University's Queen Mary College. After dabbling unhappily in local government finance for a while, he went to work for The Scotsman newspaper in Edinburgh. The launch of the paper's website, scotsman.com, in the early years of the dotcom craze, saw Ben move online to manage the Business and Motors channels before becoming deputy editor with responsibility for all aspects of online production for The Scotsman, Scotland on Sunday and the Edinburgh Evening News websites, along with the papers' Edinburgh Festivals website.
Ben joined MoneyWeek as website editor in 2008, just as the Great Financial Crisis was brewing. He has written extensively for the website and magazine, with a particular emphasis on alternative finance and fintech, including blockchain and bitcoin. As an early adopter of bitcoin, Ben bought when the price was under $200, but went on to spend it all on foolish fripperies.
In the doghouse: hundreds of investment funds are underperforming - is it time to sell?
News The latest Spot The Dog research from Bestinvest reveals 151 funds are failing to beat their benchmark. We reveal the worst performers
By Marc Shoffman Published
Nationwide: House prices creep up for the first time in over a year
Nationwide’s latest house price index reveals property prices are finally rising. Will this pattern continue in 2024?
By Vaishali Varu Published