One year on from its inception, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has got itself into trouble. The regulator was lambasted by Chancellor George Osborne this week for causing a slump of up to 20% in insurers' share prices last Friday.
On Friday morning a report appeared in The Daily Telegraph saying that the FCA planned to review around 30 million pensions and life insurance policies sold from the 1970s onwards. Worried investors promptly ditched their insurance shares, concerned about the potential for wide-ranging compensation claims.
It wasn't until the early afternoon that the FCA clarified that the scope of the probe would be much narrower than originally reported. The FCA admitted that the fiasco was "not its finest hour".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
What the commentators said
This is an "extraordinary" affair, said Dominic O'Connell in The Sunday Times. The FCA is supposed to "prevent false markets in share prices, not create them". Life insurers have plenty to answer for, including their "abysmal investment performance" and "bloated charges". But allowing share prices to crash on unjustified fears of a regulatory crackdown is "unacceptable".
Why talk to a newspaper about a review not due to be announced until the following week? asked Nils Pratley in The Guardian. "It looks as if the regulator was chasing headlines" in a wish to be seen as more active than its predecessor, the Financial Services Authority. "Regulators play such games at their peril."
Nor does the FCA seem to have understood what a mistake it was to give an exclusive briefing to one newspaper, even though it was clear how prices would react. Now that the chancellor has waded in, chief executive Martin Wheatley's days look numbered.
The insurance industry has wasted no time in calling for Wheatley's head, said James Moore in The Independent. "Please." When was the last time a life insurance executive resigned after something went wrong on their watch? Any blood on the floor from this affair will be a mere drop compared to "the vats life insurers spent sucking from their unfortunate clients".
Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.
After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.
His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.
Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.
House prices are falling in London but how does it compare to the rest of the UK?
Advice The capital remains the most expensive part of the UK to buy a property, but it isn’t being as badly hit by the housing market slump. Where are London house prices heading?
By Marc Shoffman Published
Will a Santa Rally provide festive cheer for investors this year?
News Equities often get a seasonal boost during December - will there be a Santa Rally in 2023?
By Marc Shoffman Published