Film review: Rise and fall of a Wall Street predator

"The Wolf of Wall Street" is no morality play, says Matthew Partridge. But it is entertaining.

675-wows-1

Leonardo DiCaprio combines sleaze with charisma as rogue trader Jordan Belfort

Most films about criminals, especially white collar' ones, follow a set formula. The criminal starts out honest, but quickly realises that breaking the law is much more profitable. We are shown the ever-more audacious and immoral tricks he uses to build his fortune. Finally, after a brief moment in which he is able to enjoy his wealth, he is destroyed by hubris, and left with nothing.

But anyone expecting a morality play or a guidebook from The Wolf of Wall Street, which chronicles the rise and fall of stock promoter Jordan Belfort, will be disappointed. Rather than focus on his money-making schemes, the film spends most of its time documenting the opulence and orgies that his ill-gotten millions allowed him to enjoy.

To be fair, director Martin Scorsese and screenwriter Terence Winter do make some attempt to give the viewer a rough idea of how Belfort's infamous boiler room' brokerages which made money by steering investors into dodgy unlisted shares were run.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

An early scene, in which Belfort (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) is given a lecture by his boss on how to succeed on Wall Street, feels authentic, and makes the point that many respectable' firms don't exactly have their clients' best interests at heart.

A reference to Lehman Brothers, which at the time was owned by American Express and known as Shearson Lehman, is the only noticeable mistake.

However, the film could have benefited from a bit more detail. At one point Belfort starts to explain how the scam operated, before deciding that "you're not interested in that stuff". Maybe so, but Scorsese could easily have trimmed some of the many extended sex scenes to make a bit of room for those of us who are genuinely interested in the financial side of things.

If you really want to understand how many otherwise sensible investors ended up being robbed blind, I'd recommend the 2000 film Boiler Room (also loosely based on Belfort's operation).

What's also interesting and perhaps a little jarring is that the connection between Belfort's behaviour and his downfall isn't as clear as you'd expect. I won't spoil the plot by going into the details and clearly this isn't a blood and guts gangster story such as Goodfellas or Casino but while the storyline is limited to an extent by a need to follow what happened in real' life, the result is that it lacks the bite of some of Scorsese's previous storytelling.

675-wows-2

Perhaps the best visual gag is where Belfort follows the example of a Popeye cartoon playing on a nearby television, substituting cocaine for spinach to counteract the effects of a sleep-inducing Quaalude binge.

DiCaprio effectively combines sleaze with charisma in the title role, while maintaining a veneer of innocence. He has played a financial fraudster with a taste for excess before, in Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby, but this is a far more energetic performance.

Margot Robbie and Jonah Hill provide excellent support as Belfort's second wife Naomi and partner-in-crime Danny, respectively. Joanna Lumley, who plays his wife's aunt, also steals the scenes she appears in, especially a hilarious moment where she and DiCaprio each believe the other is trying to seduce them.

Reviews have generally been positive, though with some reservations. The FT's Nigel Andrews thinks "it's like being hit over the head for 179 minutes by a cocaine-overdosed Statue of Liberty". But while The Guardian's Peter Bradshaw agrees that it lacks "the subtlety and richness of Scorsese's very best work", it is still "an incredibly exhilarating film".

Similarly, The Sunday Times's Camilla Long says that, while "I'd love to say I was thoroughly disgusted by the whole revolting mess", she "loved it, every last humping, grunting greasy moment of it". I'd have to say I agree with her. The Wolf of Wall Street is on national release.

Dr Matthew Partridge
Shares editor, MoneyWeek

Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.

He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.

Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.

As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.

Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri