Standard Chartered's Chief Executive has taken charge of negotiations with the New York regulator that has accused the bank of illegally processing 250 billion dollars of payments for Iran.
The bank maintains the total number of payments that didn't comply with US sanctions laws was just a fraction of the alleged 60,000 transactions.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Talks with New York state regulators over how much a settlement would cost Standard are ongoing ahead of an official hearing in front of the Department of Financial Services.
It is unclear whether boss Peter Sands will attend Wednesday's hearing or even whether it will be held in public or private.
Executives will have to face Benjamin Lawsky, the head of the regulator, who has ordered the management to explain why the bank shouldn't lose its license.
He has accused Standard of being a "rogue institution" for breaking US sanctions against Iran.
Sands has furiously denied Lawsky's claims, insisting that almost all the payments were legal.
A broad range of politicians and City figures have accused Lawsky of trying to damage London's reputation as a financial centre and win business for America.
The latest allegations follow hefty fines being levied against Barclays and HSBC by US regulators, for interest rate fixing and facilitating money laundering, respectively.
Standard Chartered is already in discussion with the US Justice Department over a separate matter concerning violation of sanctions laws.
-
Reeves warned against property tax shake-up – 3 ways it could backfire on first-time buyersRachel Reeves reportedly has her eye on high-end property taxes in the upcoming Budget, but there are concerns a shake-up could unintentionally hamper those trying to get on the housing ladder
-
Average Brits want to retire five years before they can – who has the widest retirement gap?Brits are expecting to work for longer than ever but there are big disparities in the number of extra working years predicted. A small tweak could help close the gap
