How companies have juiced their lemons

Corporate profits in America may not have been as rosy as you've been led to believe, says Tim Bennett. That could spell trouble for stock markets.

It's not just the potential actions of the Federal Reserve that should worry investors, according to former Goldman Sachs economist Gavyn Davies, writing in the Financial Times. "The fundamental earning capacity of corporate America" is about to be "found wanting".

Take a look at the annual contribution that company profits make to GDP (broadly, a measure of national wealth) over the last century and you will find that it fluctuates around a pretty constant average. However, in recent years corporate profits as a share of GDP have risen sharply "above previous peaks". Why? Because at the same time the share of GDP accounted for by wages has been falling to "unprecedented depths".

According to the International Labour Organisation, a UN agency, the share of GDP in the advanced economies accounted for by gross profit has risen by about 10% of GDP over the past 30 years. The wage share has fallen by about the same amount. So shareholders have enjoyed a windfall as firms have grown output per head while shrinking real' (after-inflation) wages. Put bluntly, firms have squeezed more juice from their lemons than ever before.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

How much more? Davies estimates that if that 10% drop in the wage share of GDP had not occurred, and everything else had stayed the same, then net corporate profits would be up to two-thirds lower than they are today. The reasons behind this shift are complex technology, globalisation and a reduction in labour bargaining power have all played their part.

But one thing's for sure: should this decline in wages reverse and most trends "mean revert" eventually equity markets could be very vulnerable indeed.

Tim graduated with a history degree from Cambridge University in 1989 and, after a year of travelling, joined the financial services firm Ernst and Young in 1990, qualifying as a chartered accountant in 1994.

He then moved into financial markets training, designing and running a variety of courses at graduate level and beyond for a range of organisations including the Securities and Investment Institute and UBS. He joined MoneyWeek in 2007.