I enjoy using Twitter.
For those who aren't aware, Twitter is a website that lets you broadcast your thoughts to the world in 140 characters. More importantly, it lets you follow other people who might be saying interesting things, or linking to interesting articles. (You can follow the MoneyWeek team here).
It's great for keeping abreast of breaking news, and sending messages to other users.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
But can it make you a better investor?
Can Twitter make you a better investor?
The FT's Gillian Tett recently took a look at the results of a new study from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Academics Sandy Pentland and Yaniv Altusher looked at how social media (such as Twitter) affects investment performance.
The researchers looked at the eToro' trading platform. This allows traders not only to chat about markets, but also to watch each others' trades, and even copy them, if they wish.
The upshot of the study was that the best investors were those who "received information from a wide range of social groups and copied a range of gurus performed 10% better than normal' traders." They also did better than "traders following one or two gurus."
In short: "maintaining diverse social ties and swapping information with several different crowds tends to raise returns."
Of course not. Investors should be very picky about the information they consume. If anything, most of us should be consuming less news and information. It's all too easy to be tempted to over-trade when you've got headlines screaming at you from every direction.
The real lesson from social media
However, the study does highlight a key psychological threat that every investor should be aware of: confirmation bias'.
Human beings like to feel in control of their environment. It's a survival mechanism. We form theories and look for patterns so that we can navigate an uncertain world with some sense of confidence that we're making the right decisions. If we didn't have this instinct, we'd spend most of the day sitting on the sofa, paralysed by indecision.
The trouble is, it's very easy to get wedded to the illusion of certainty. It takes a lot of effort to build a world view that we feel comfortable with. So we hate it when our way of looking at things is challenged. Particularly if incorporating the new information would mean having to change our minds about a view that has proved useful in the past.
The discomfort we feel when we can't incorporate a piece of information into our existing world view is called "cognitive dissonance." It's an unpleasant sensation like an itch you can't scratch. So it's something that we all try to avoid.
We stock up on arguments to defend our views, and attack the opposing view. And sometimes, if we can't give a well-argued answer to a point, we'll resort to distraction tactics or personal attacks.
You only have to look at how defensive people get when discussing politics or religion to see this in action. Ever wanted to chuck a brick through the telly when you're watching Question Time? (Who hasn't?). That's cognitive dissonance for you.
In short, we'd rather be proved right than proved wrong. So we seek out information and views that confirm our own take on things, and ignore information that contradicts it. This is confirmation bias' in action. And the higher the stakes, the more prone we become to it.
This is a big problem for investors. Because when we invest, we are backing our opinions with money. So the stakes are high.
Two ways to deal with confirmation bias
What can you do about this? The first solution is to seek out views that oppose your own before you invest. A key part of disciplined investing is to write down your reason for investing in a stock or any other asset before you do so. That way, you have a record of your thought process, which can help a lot when it comes to deciding whether to sell, or add more to a position.
But another good exercise is to try to make the case for doing the opposite of what you're doing. So if you plan to buy a stock, try to make the case for shorting it. Write down all the reasons why this stock is going to tank, and why anyone who shorts it will make a fortune.
If you end up being more convinced by the short' story than the long' case then maybe you shouldn't be investing in that particular stock.
That might sound like a lot of work. But really, thinking about it, it's not a lot more effort than you'd put into buying a new car or even a new TV. Given the amount of money that you're probably putting at stake, you should be thinking these decisions through before you make them.
But there's a second part to this, which is to build a portfolio that doesn't depend on any given world view being correct'. This is the secret behind diversification: making sure you don't have all your eggs in one basket.
In effect, you want to future proof' your portfolio so that regardless of what happens in the future, you have a better chance of riding disasters out with minimal losses.
This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .
Follow John on Twitter||Google+ John Stepek
Our recommended articles for today
Why house prices aren't all they seem
Don't be duped into believing that Britain's housing market is heading for a full-blown recovery, says Merryn Somerset Webb. It's all an elaborate illusion.
Here comes the Sugar King
One of Asia's most successful businessmen has taken a big gamble on Africa. Lars Henriksson looks at how the sugar king' aims to help the continent to unleash its true potential - and what investors can learn from him.
John is the executive editor of MoneyWeek and writes our daily investment email, Money Morning. John graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news. John joined MoneyWeek in 2005.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
Pension withdrawals on the rise, HMRC data reveals
Pension withdrawal data has led to some raising concerns over savers ‘raiding’ their pensions unsustainably.
By John Fitzsimons Published
ONS: UK economy recovered from pandemic faster than previously thought
Revisions from the ONS showed the UK economy has grown since the pandemic, while the latest data showed GDP grew in the second quarter of 2023.
By Nicole García Mérida Published