Learn to be a judge, not a lawyer, when investing

Filtering out analysis that conflicts with our own judgments is one of the greatest hazards of investing. Here, Tim Bennett explains what you can do about it.

Confirmation bias' a tendency only to pay attention to data and opinions that confirm our pre-existing beliefs is just one of our many psychological handicaps as investors. If we own a stock, we only like to hear bullish opinions. But the less well-known flip side of confirmation bias motivated reasoning' is just as dangerous, says RP Seawright, chief executive of Madison Securities. In short, we tend to "scrutinise ideas more critically when we disagree with them, than when we agree".

A classic 1964 study on smoking and cancer makes this clear. Smokers and non-smokers were asked to evaluate the conclusion of the then-Surgeon General, who had linked smoking to cancer. Non-smokers tended to agree with him, whereas smokers tended not to, quoting a range of anecdotal evidence (such as "lots of things are hazardous") in their defence.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Tim graduated with a history degree from Cambridge University in 1989 and, after a year of travelling, joined the financial services firm Ernst and Young in 1990, qualifying as a chartered accountant in 1994.

He then moved into financial markets training, designing and running a variety of courses at graduate level and beyond for a range of organisations including the Securities and Investment Institute and UBS. He joined MoneyWeek in 2007.