Brady riding high
Brady, a software provider to the commodities sector, says acquisitions and the buoyancy of its sector boosted earnings in 2011.
Brady, a software provider to the commodities sector, says acquisitions and the buoyancy of its sector boosted earnings in 2011.
Total sales revenue jumped 72% over 2010 to £19.2m, with adjusted operating profits gaining 56% to hit £2.36m. The dividend was increased 8% to 1.4p per share while earnings per share increased 111% to 3.57 pence.
During 2011 Brady signed 14 "significant" licence contracts including its first deals in Hong Kong, Singapore and North Africa.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Since the end of 2011 the company has completed acquisitions of Navita and Syseca.
Paul Fullagar, the group's Chairman, said:
"The group's acquisition of Brady Energy in December 2010 has continued to exceed expectations and we are delighted with the shareholder support we received for the recent £18m share placing which allowed us to complete the transformational acquisition of Navita in March 2012."
Shares in Brady had risen 3.9% by 08:59. The group's stock has gained 19% in the last 12 months.
BS
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
-
Average earners now face £200,000 inheritance tax bill - how much will your estate owe?
‘Double whammy’ of inheritance tax changes means even the estates of those earning the average UK wage could face bills, not just the very wealthy
-
Are the wealthy dodging more tax than previously thought?
A new report suggests tax non-compliance among the wealthy could be worse than previously imagined. Is an overly complex system partly to blame?