Tired of running out of time and money? Scrimping and saving just to make ends meet?
Try moving to Harlingen, Texas. The cost of living there is only about 40% of the cost of living in Manhattan. Real Time Economicshas thereport.
You can live more cheaply in a place like Harlingen. You're almost guaranteed to lower your spending, because there's not much there to spend money on.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Get 6 issues free
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
We've never been to Harlingen, so maybe we're wrong, but we imagine it is a pretty slow place. Few fancy restaurants. Few theatres. Few luxury shops. Which makes it hard to part with money.
Of course, this improves your cash-flow. But it also allows you the glorious privilege of doing nothing.
As our friend in Florida reminded us, most people can't stop. Money in; money out. They have to work to pay the bills. No question of taking time off. No time to think. No time to sit still and wait for the storm to pass.
Back in the time of the Great Depression, millions of Americans were still not completely caught up in the money economy. Many still lived on the land. They kept pigs and chickens. They tended their own gardens and 'put up' their own canned goods. They cut their own wood to heat their houses. They pumped water from their own wells. Many still made their own clothes.
When the Depression came, they could hunker down and wait it out.
But today, the developed world is in a Great Correction. And it shows no sign of coming to an end. Japan is already in a slump that has lasted off and on longer than most marriages. Europe is headed into a slump with half of all young people jobless in many countries. And in the US, at this stage in a typical recession/recovery cycle, the economy should be growing at an 8% rate. Instead, growth is below 2%.
Why? This is no typical recession/recovery cycle. Instead, the private sector is cutting back on debt. At the present, household debt is going down (mostly via mortgage foreclosures) at about 5% of GDP per year.
At this rate, it could take ten years or more to get household debt down to more comfortable levels, say, around 70% of disposable income.
But the average household can't wait ten years for the de-leveraging to do its work. Heck, it can't even waittwo months. Both parents work. They've got two cars. And two mortgages. Money in; money out. 24/7...
No garden. No firewood. No chickens. No time to wait. No time to sit still. Just bills, bills, bills...
They've got to work, they've got to earn money, they've got to spend.
They can't do nothing.
They should move to Harlingen.
And more thoughts
Not much action on Wall Street. The Dow barely moved yesterday. The FTSE was flat. Oil is right at $100 a barrel. The ten-year T-note yield is still below 2%.
The Greeks are "toast," says our colleague Chris Hunter. The Germans are fed up with them. It looks like they are going to push the Greeks into default and out of the euro.
But the threat of a Greek default casts a shadow over all of Europe. The New York Timeshas the story.
Empires come and go. And in coming and going, they seem to be symmetrical. The way up takes about as long as the way down. The Roman Empire took hundreds of years to reach its peak and hundreds of years to go away. The Third Reich was supposed to last for 1,000 years, too. Instead, it lasted 12, with about eight years of expansion and four years of contraction.
The British Empire got underway with the conquest of Scotland and Ireland. One hundred years after the Battle of Culloden, which crushed the clans and sealed Scotland's fate, the Brits ruled half the world. But 100 years later, their empire was mostly gone with the US having taken away the imperial crown.
America's empire could be said to have begun with the defeat of the South in the War Between the States. Or, perhaps with the invasion of the Philippines in 1899. It peaked in the early 70s when US wages reached a top. Or, maybe in the 80s, when China began to compete with it and the US shifted from a creditor nation to a debtor. Now it is on the downward slope. In a few years, China will have the world's biggest economy. A few years later, it will probably have the world's dominant military force.
Will the decline be graceful and dignified? Or marked by bankruptcy, hyperinflation, war and shame?
John Kagan, writing in the Wall Street Journal, doesn't think he will like it: "If and when American power declines, the institutions and norms that American power has supported will decline, too. Or more likely, if history is a guide, they may collapse altogether as we make a transition to another kind of world order, or to disorder. We may discover then that the U.S. was essential to keeping the present world order together and that the alternative to American power was not peace and harmony but chaos and catastrophewhich is what the world looked like right before the American order came into being."
We don't know what will happen. But we doubt we will like it either.
Still, we're not silly enough to think that the path to imperial decay can be blocked by our own willpower. Here's Kagan again, delusional: "... international order is not an evolution; it is an imposition. It is the domination of one vision over othersin America's case, the domination of free-market and democratic principles, together with an international system that supports them. The present order will last only as long as those who favor it and benefit from it retain the will and capacity to defend it."
He seems to think that if an imperial power spends more money on its military industry it will somehow resist the tides and the winds. All of imperial history argues that he's wrong.
When an empire's time is up, it's up.
Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .
Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. https://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34
High earners underestimate how much they need to retire comfortably
Retired banker who gave wife £80m to avoid inheritance tax won’t face equal split in divorce
