Nothing special in yesterday's financial news. So let's turn from farce to fraud, that is, to politics.
President Obama has to defend his policies, pretending that they have brought a real recovery. One of the pillars of his case, say the papers, is that unemployment has gone down.
The trouble with this as a re-election strategy is that the people who need to vote for Obama are the people who know it isn't true.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Washington Blog reports:
There are 243 million working age Americans.
There are 142 million employed Americans.
Only 101 million of the employed Americans are working more than 35 hours per week. This means that only 41.6% of all working age Americans have a full-time job.
According to the government drones at the BLS, 88 million Americans have "chosen" to not be in the labour force the highest level in US history.
The percentage of Americans in the workforce at 63.8% is the lowest since 1980 and down from a peak of 67.1% in 2000. The difference between these two percentages iseight million Americans.
The BLS reports there are only 12.7 million unemployed Americans in the country, down from 15.3 million in 2009.
The BLS reports the unemployment rate has dropped from 10% in late 2009 to 8.3% today. Over this time frame the working age population grew by 5.7 million, while the number of employed Americans grew by 3.6 million. Only a government drone could interpret this data and report a dramatic decline in the unemployment rate.
Since 2000, the working age population of the US has grown by 30 million. But the actual number of people with jobs has grown only by 12 million.
And if they reported the unemployment rate today the same way they did during the Great Depression, unemployment would be at 22% only slightly below the level of the 30s.
So, what happens to all the people who don't find work? They go on disability!
The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that Social Security's disability trust fund will run out of money in four years in 2016. It will be amazing if it lasts that long. Because the disability rolls are growing twice as fast as the employment rolls.
Yes, dear reader, since the recession ended, officially, in June '09, for every new person who has found a job two supposedly have been disabled. At least, they've been added to the list of people receiving SSID benefits.
Could we get on disability? Maybe. We went to the website to see if we could qualify. You just have to show that you have a condition that will prevent you from working for at least a year. And you must show that you've been employed in the past. If you're 60 years old, for example, you need to show nine and a half years of previous employment.
During the Nixon administration, approximately 2% of the labour force was disabled. Now, it's over 6%.
Disability, not employment, is Obama's real achievement. Since June 2009, he's added 4.7 million people who are judged too disabled, too stupid, too fat, or just too lazy and depressed to find work.
Of course, you can't blame them. The feds set up a zombie economy. It protects and rewards zombie industries healthcare that doesn't really make people healthier, education that doesn't make them any smarter, defence that doesn't make them any more secure and finance that takes the feds' money and pockets it.
It turns both rich and poor into parasites.
And more thoughts
Europe is turning against its elite austerity pushers. Sarkozy lost the first round to the socialist candidate. The Dutch government of Mark Rutte handed in its resignation to Queen Beatrix. The technocrats' in Italy and Greece wonder how long they can hold on.
America, meanwhile, is settling down to a presidential election. On the one hand is a candidate who seems to have no firm convictions and no real ideas about how to move the country out of its post-crisis funk. On the other hand, is... well... the same thing.
As usual, the candidates are disappointing. But politics is a tawdry profession that invites hustlers and hollow men. No matter what kind of system you think you have, it is always the same. It is always dominated by the same fellow grasping, status-hungry, ambitious. He is a world improver, a bully, a scold, a power-broker. He is a fixer and a user. He uses the power of the government that is, the power to force people to do what you want, at the point of a gun if necessary to fix himself, his friends, and, he often believes, the entire world. At best, the politician is a conniving opportunist. At worst, he's a madman or a mass-murderer.
In a democracy, the candidate himself is often just an empty shell, ready to be filled up by a clever scallywag or rich donor.
In a monarchy, sometimes the king is real power, often it is a dark figure peering out from behind the dolt in the purple robes.
Even in a dictatorship, the real ruler may not be the dictator himself; it could be a group of powerful men.
The more power at stake, the harder the man-on-the-make works to get it. In extreme cases, he will stop at nothing, neither at assassination nor theft nor fraud.
Yes, occasionally a decent man gets into office, usually by accident. Rarely does he last long. And when he is gone, the historians tell us what a failure he was. "He didn't do anything", they say.
Of course, every society has its limits, its norms, its traditions. A man whose ambition is too naked or whose methods seem too ruthless won't get what he is after; people won't stand for it.
But, under pressure, the limits stretch. People welcome his clumsy lies. They ignore his crimes and excuse his ham-handed techniques. Later, they get fed up with him but often not for many, many years.
On the whole, people are not very smart. They'll believe almost anything.
Washington Blog warns: "The next six months leading up to the November elections will surely provide a shining example of the degraded society we've become. Both parties and their propaganda machines, SuperPacs, and corporate media sponsors will treat the igadget distracted masses to hundreds of hours of lies, spin, and vitriol, designed to divert the public from the fact that both parties act on behalf of the same masters and have no intention of changing course of the U.S. Titanic to avert the iceberg dead ahead. We will be treated to storylines about race, gun control, the war on women, energy independence, global warming, the war on terror, the imminent threat of Iran and North Korea, Obamacare, Romneycare, and of course the economy, stupid."
The New York Times reports that shoppers in oil-rich Venezuela wait in long lines to buy common foodstuffs; it doesn't seem to occur to them that their inconvenience is a by-product of Hugo Chavez's price controls. Instead, they blame greedy businesses and wait.
In America, more than a decade after 9/11, they wait in long lines as crippled 90-year-olds get felt up by TSA agents. "You can't be too safe", they say, as if their lives were put at risk by Lutheran grandmothers.
In Spain, Greece, Ireland and practically all modern countries, they wait for government to figure out how to give them retirement incomes, healthcare, and full employment.
Of course, the politicians can't solve economic problems for a very simple reason: they are the cause of them.
Who set up the euro? Who set interest rates and lending standards? Who caused the bubbles by lending too low for too long? Who then fixed' the crisis by lending more, at even lower rates, to the very institutions who had just proven such bad custodians?
Who spends more than he makes year in and year out? Who promises even more spending even as he is facing bankruptcy? Who counterfeits money printing trillions of dollars with nothing more behind them than the "good faith" and "full credit" of an insolvent government? Who starts wars' that cost trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives and then, standing over the wreckage, announces victory and slithers away?
That's right. The feds, the fixers, the world-improvers do all these things. But how could it be any different?
A decent man is too busy improving his business, his home, his family to take much interest in politics. Besides, he knows it is a flim-flam. He's seen how hard it is to make any real improvement at home, even when you are close to the facts and on the job full time. Imagine trying to improve things far away, where you don't really know what is going on!
An honest man knows better than to interfere in other peoples' business. His own business is tough enough. He cares deeply about the things around him and tries to make his world better in every way he can. But he would be embarrassed to pretend to solve other peoples' problems. Even if he is only offering advice, he does so reluctantly, carefully and tentatively.
If he is smart he knows that you can't really make things better by bullying and threatening people. An economy works best by doing the one thing that the fixers can't allow letting people make their own deals, find their own jobs, and solve their own problems.
It's the one thing the fixers can't do, and the one thing every candidate regards as political suicide just getting out of the way. Instead, the successful politician needs a plan, a program, a tax credit, a spending proposal. He needs to be in charge. He needs to be an activist, promising to reward enough voters to get elected. He can't have no answer. He can't have no interest. He can't have a trace of modesty or a realistic assessment of the situation or his ability to understand it, let alone do anything about it. Instead, he must pretend to care about the sick, the lame, the blind, the fat, the shiftless and have a programme, right in his back pocket, that will make that poor man's life better.
The last thing he can be is the very thing you most want in a politician: someone who doesn't really give a damn.
Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .
Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. https://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34
