CGT: I’m feeling a bit hard done by

It’s time for a moan.

I was looking at my personal investments the other day and decided I should reduce a couple of my larger long-standing holdings. The only problem is I’m going to have to pay quite a bit of capital gains tax (CGT).

Just to quickly recap: capital gains are those profits you make from selling an asset at more than the price you paid for it. Capital gains tax – as the name suggests – is the tax you pay on those profits.

Now, I’m not opposed to paying my fair share of tax and have paid some CGT over the years in the management of my portfolio.

Admittedly, it was a little irritating mostly because my gains came from investing money which I had already paid income tax on. But given the practical necessity of taxing both income and capital, I didn’t mind signing the cheque too much.

In fact, when I was younger with not much spare cash, I used to joke that it would be nice to have a CGT problem! But after 30 years of saving and investing, I’m in a position where I feel the joke’s on me and others like me.

An odd state of affairs

Of course, there’s an obvious way to get around CGT – just don’t sell anything. CGT is known as an ‘optional’ tax after all. Optional, in the sense that you only become liable for it if you decide to sell an asset. So if you never trade, you don’t crystallise any gains – and you’ll never have to make a CGT payment.

But that’s a dangerous game to play. Even those of us who try and take a long-term view need to make some trades.

My average holding period might well be over three years, but I still have to ring some changes to keep the list feeling sufficiently fresh. It’s like tending a garden. You have to pull out the weeds and encourage new growth – otherwise you’ll find the weeds can take over.

But as I said, I’m not against CGT in theory. The problem is that the CGT regime has undergone some changes in recent years.

It all started with Gordon Brown and political tinkering by successive chancellors means that we’ve ended up with an odd state of affairs. The only constant is that there’s an annual allowance on gains, below which you don’t have to pay tax.

So how did we get to this point?

Let’s look at how CGT was levied ‘BGB’ – that’s before Gordon Brown!

Cleaning ladies paying more tax than fund managers

It was pretty simple really. You paid tax at your marginal rate on gains above the annual tax-free allowance. But importantly, those gains were adjusted for inflation. This meant that if an investment had only kept pace with the retail price index (RPI), there would be nothing to pay.

Which was fair.

But then Gordon Brown changed things. He wanted to tinker with the rules to encourage long-term investment. So out went inflation adjustment and in came ‘taper relief’.

Taper relief meant your gains were ‘tapered’ depending on how long you’d owned the shares. So, after three years, they started to be reduced, and by the tenth year of ownership, you would only pay CGT on 60% of the gain.

Where the fun and games came in was with ‘business assets’. These received accelerated relief – so only half the gain was taxable after one year, and only a quarter if the asset was owned for two or more years.

Shares listed on Aim benefited from this generous treatment – so I found myself thanking Mr Brown when I banked a profit on Aim.

Unfortunately, as often happens when politicians tinker with the rules, this had unintended consequences. Suddenly, wealthy private equity fund managers found themselves paying an effective 10% income tax rate – lower than their cleaning ladies as one executive pointed out.

That was political dynamite.

So, cue more changes.

Out went taper relief and in came a simple flat rate of 18% for CGT for everyone. Then came another change where higher rate taxpayers now pay CGT at a 28% rate.

It’s a bit frustrating frankly

So that’s where we’ve ended up. No relief for the impact of inflation. No incentive to invest for the long term. Which leaves me feeling a bit hard done by when I consider selling shares I’ve held for ten years. Even in this ‘low-inflation era’, the RPI has gone up about 40% over the last decade.

The other oddity is that wealthier people get a much better deal with the 28% rate than basic rate taxpayers get with their 18% CGT rate.

At least it’s easier to do the sums nowadays, which is a blessing in the world of tax.


MoneyWeek Trader is our FREE spread betting & trading email offering you the very best tips, secrets and guidance from our trading expert, John Burford, who has years of first-hand experience.

To start receiving John's emails three times a week (plus occasional promotions), enter your email address below:

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

  • mr clyde

    This article gets right to the core of what is absolutely wrong about the general attitude to capital gains. Leaving aside the annual CGT allowance and the multitude of avoidance mechanisms e.g. Property relief, ISAs, VCTs, EISs etc, the rates of CGT are still lower than equivalent rates of income tax. Yes, there is currently some fiscal drag wrt inflation relief but this is a political fiddle rather than a failing in CGT. Furthermore, the argument that CGT is somehow unfair because the original funding is already taxed is just plain wrong. You don’t pay CGT on the original investment only on the gain! The argument for lower CGT reliefs was always to compensate for risk taking and in the case of Business Relief there is some justification (albeit that 10% CGT on millions is too low). Otherwise CGT should be universally charged on all capital gains at rates at par with Income tax. This, at a stroke, will allow for the abolition of properly unfair taxes such as stamp duty, IHT etc, and put a large chunk of the tax avoidance industry out of business.

  • Clive

    I always sell a chunk of my portfolio each year (move to other investments) to ensure I make use of the annual CGT limit. Case of “use it or lose it”. Plus, if there happens to be a crash, sell stuff to book the loss. Can carry that forward for years.

  • John O

    Thanks for article David, I was surprised it has taken the financial press so long to highlight this huge injustice in the tax system.
    Removing inflation relief from CGT was one of most cynical stealth taxes.
    Almost at a stroke, it discourages long-term investment and encourages short term trading. Also it means that many people with diversified savings are “stuck” in the shares of underperforming companies to avoid the tax, propping up their price.
    I thought governments wanted people to save and invest in industry? Oh of course, I forgot, the modern breed of professional “conviction” politicians can only vote in measures to please the vindictive and weak-minded and win them the next election.
    Or perhaps they think it really clever, to invent a tax on the inflation that governments create, because that is what it is.

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Cleaning up

Profiting from the fight against pollution

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

The Kids' Portfolio: the four best funds to buy for your children

Investing for your children's long-term future is an excellent idea. But what should you buy? The Kids' Portfolio is a simple collection of four funds intended to be tucked away for 20 to 40 years.