Outing the closet index funds

If you own a Volkswagen you probably know you can buy a similar car under the Skoda logo for less – say, 10% for an equivalent – with both running on the same engine. But you might still stick with the old brand. Now imagine that the VW was not 10%, but 1,000% more expensive. Surely anyone in their right mind would choose the Skoda?

Yet, according to new research from fund manager SCM Private, many of us ignore a huge cost gap when choosing active funds over indexed equivalents, even though there’s little difference between them. SCM reports that nearly half of the average actively managed UK equity fund is closet indexed. In other words, many fund managers largely replicate their benchmark index, while charging investors an arm and a leg for a service they could get far more cheaply elsewhere.

As a reminder, the average actively managed UK equity fund costs around 1.5%-1.75% a year. You can buy a FTSE All-Share index tracker from firms such as SWIP or Vanguard for a tenth or less of that annual cost. Yet only a quarter of UK equity funds have holdings that radically differ from those of the index, SCM reports. These truly active funds have also performed much better than the closet indexers. However, there’s no guarantee that even the fund managers who do stick their necks out will continue to prosper.

SCM’s founder, Alan Miller (once a leading stock picker before turning his interest to index funds and exchange-traded funds), tells me that the recent outperformance of some more concentrated active funds was due to their heavy holdings in small- and mid-caps, which have done well. Whether or not that trend continues, at least that subset of truly active managers was doing what it was paid for. By contrast, the managers of the ‘closet indexed’ funds may well, in SCM’s view, be in breach of the Financial Conduct Authority’s regulatory guideline to “conduct business with integrity”.

The implications for investors are clear. Use a cheap index fund for core holdings in the stock market. If you want to use an active fund manager, at least choose one who is prepared to have a view.

Alternatively, for your ‘non-core’ equity holdings, you can either buy individual stocks or one of the new generation of ‘smart beta’ funds, which follow an active strategy, but do so at a much lower cost than the typical fund manager.

• Paul Amery is a freelance journalist, formerly a fund manager and trader.

Merryn

Claim 12 issues of MoneyWeek (plus much more) for just £12!

Let MoneyWeek show you how to profit, whatever the outcome of the upcoming general election.

Start your no-obligation trial today and get up to speed on:

  • The latest shifts in the economy…
  • The ongoing Brexit negotiations…
  • The new tax rules…
  • Trump’s protectionist policies…

Plus lots more.

We’ll show you what it all means for your money.

Plus, the moment you begin your trial, we’ll rush you over THREE free investment reports:

‘How to escape the most hated tax in Britain’: Inheritance tax hits many unsuspecting families. Our report tells how to pass on up to £2m of your money to your family without the taxman getting a look in.

‘How to profit from a Trump presidency’: The election of Donald Trump was a watershed moment for the US economy. This report details the sectors our analysts think will boom from Trump’s premiership, and gives specific investments you can buy to profit.

‘Best shares to watch in 2017’: Includes the transcript from our roundtable panel of investment professionals – and 12 tips they’re currently tipping. The report also analyses key assets, including property, oil and the countries whose stock markets currently offer the most value.