Based abroad? Avoid portfolio bonds

If you’re an expatriate expecting to return to the UK in the future, there’s a good chance someone will already have tried to sell you an offshore portfolio bond as a vehicle for saving for old age. If not, expect to be approached sooner rather than later and be very wary – this multi-billion-pound industry generates lucrative commissions for financial advisers specialising in the expatriate market, but rarely offers a good deal.

The first big caveat is that the word “bond” is misleading – these products have nothing to do with the fixed-income securities issued by governments and corporations, which are often seen as less risky investments. Rather, portfolio bonds are wrappers within which you can hold a broad range of other assets, including most of the investments available to UK savers with individual savings accounts (Isas).

Advisers claim the main selling point of offshore bonds is their tax efficiency. There’s no tax to pay while your investments are growing, other than a small amount of withholding tax automatically deducted from certain international dividends and interest payments. Instead, you only pay tax when you return to the UK and cash the bond in (if you cash it in elsewhere, different local tax rules may apply).

The gains and income on your bond are taxed as income in the UK, which can be handy if you’ve moved into a lower tax band by this stage – if you’ve retired, for example, and are no longer liable for higher-rate or additional-rate tax. Even if you’re still paying these higher rates, you may be able to reduce your tax liability through a relief known as top-slicing, which effectively allows you to average out the gains you’ve made over the lifetime of the product.

Bear in mind, however, that even for higher-rate taxpayers, the capital-gains tax rate – the rate that applies to most savings and investment profits – is now 20% in the UK, the same as the basic rate of income tax. So anyone who has to pay any higher-rate income tax – charged at 40% in the UK – at all on their offshore bonds will be worse off.

Moreover, even if you do make a tax saving using offshore bonds, you’ll need to be sure it is sufficient to compensate you for the high charges of these products. In addition to charges on the underlying investments, you’ll need to pay for the wrapper itself – this can be more than 1% per year in some cases.

There will also be advisers’ charges to pay. Unlike the UK, financial advisers in many international jurisdictions are still allowed to charge sales commissions when setting up products – if you’re approached by an adviser pushing offshore bonds, they will almost certainly charge in this way. The result is an additional layer of set-up costs and ongoing fees. Indeed, if you surrender the fund after only a few years, your return is likely to be very poor, given the cost of initial sales commissions.

If not a portfolio bond, then, what are expatriates’ other options? Well, given the complexities of the different tax and regulatory systems in countries around the world, as well as people’s individual circumstances, it makes a great deal of sense to take independent financial advice on pension planning. Look for a fee-based adviser with specialist experience of your jurisdiction, and steer clear of commission chasers.

However, in many countries, expatriates will find the best option is to build up a portfolio of investments through a low-cost broker locally. Before you return to the UK, investigate whether it makes more sense to cash in those investments prior to departure, or to transfer the assets to a UK savings vehicle. You may be able to reinvest savings in tax-efficient pension schemes and Isas on your return.

A simply terrible investment – don’t go near them

The charges associated with many offshore portfolio bonds can be staggering, writes Cris Sholto Heaton. Expatriates who end up taking one out are usually unaware of how bad a deal they’re getting, partly because these products are aggressively pushed by salespeople who gloss over the disadvantages, and partly because the financial knowledge of the typical buyer is limited. These salespeople are fond of preying on English teachers and other expatriates in similar positions who have no experience of managing their investments.

Let’s take the “Vision” product offered by insurer Generali via its Guernsey subsidiary as an example of how the charges work (these bonds are typically issued by the offshore subsidiaries of major insurance firms). You take out this plan for a “premium payment term” of at least five years, and make regular contributions. The plan pays a ”loyalty bonus” to encourage investors to sign up for longer terms.

Vision has a long list of fees. There’s an “administration fee” of 2.75% per year for the first five years and 2% per year thereafter for plans lasting less than ten years, or 2% per year for ten years and 0.3% per year thereafter for plans of ten years and more (the fee is based on premiums paid rather than the value of your funds). There’s also an “investment administration charge” (1.5% per year on the value of your funds), management fees on the underlying funds and more. 

The charges are horrendously high, but the real catch is that if you want to surrender your plan within the “initial period” (which varies depending on your premium payment term), the surrender value will be zero. After the initial period is over, the surrender value will remain much lower than what you’ve paid in for much of the term of the plan. That’s because all your premiums during the initial period are allocated to “initial units” that are set aside to pay the administration fee over the duration of the plan.

You don’t get this back if you surrender early, partly because it funds big up-front commissions for intermediaries. Expensive, inflexible, complicated plans such as these are a terrible investment: no expatriate should go near them.

  • Graham Lee

    I wish I’d read this article 7 years ago, as I’m now ‘tied in’ to a 10 year Generali plan through a third party ‘wealth management’ company! (obviously theirs not mine!!). As the article rightly states, the full conditions about fees and commissions were never fully explained to me – my understanding was that the first couple of premiums would be put aside and invested – from which all fees etc would be taken – and returned to me at the end of the term as a ‘loyalty bonus’. As a result I have paid 102K premiums and the current value stands at 106K with a redemption value of 92K with 3 years to run. I’ll probably just end up with what I paid in over the 10 years. CAVEAT EMPTOR!

66% off newsstand price

12 issues (and much more) for just £12

That’s right. We’ll give you 12 issues of MoneyWeek magazine, complete access to our exclusive web articles, our latest wealth building reports and videos as well as our subscriber-only email… for just £12.

That’s just £1 per week for Britain’s best-selling financial magazine.

Click here to take advantage of our offer

Britain is leaving the European Union. Donald Trump is reducing America’s role in global markets. Both will have profound consequences for you as an investor.

MoneyWeek analyses the critical issues facing British investors on a weekly basis. And, unlike other publications, we provide you with the solutions to help you turn a situation to your financial advantage.

Take up our offer today, and we’ll send you three of our most important investment reports:

All three of these reports are yours when you take up our 12 issues for £12 offer today.

MoneyWeek has been advising private British investors on what to do with their money since 2000. Our calls over that period have enabled our readers to both make and save a great deal of money – hence our position as the UK’s most-trusted investment publication.

Click here to subscribe for just £12