Veni, vidi, Visa: profits from payment processing

Visa payment by phone ©
Apple Pay simply turns a phone into a Visa card

Visa, the payment network giant, is a highly profitable operator dominating the global market.

What could be better than making money every time someone walks into a shop and buys something? This is how it must feel owning shares in payment technology giant Visa (NYSE: V). By the time you’ve read this paragraph, it will have carried out 75,000 transactions for people and businesses all over the world using bank cards to pay for anything and everything.

Whether online or in person, each transaction moves money from customer to merchant, and, as the middleman, Visa takes a cut. It soon mounts up: in the first three months of this year, revenues were $5.5bn with operating profit margins above the typical eye-catching 60% level. Over the decade since it came to the market, sales have risen 12% and earnings per share nearly 22% a year.

With these numbers in an expanding global market, competitors should be all over it. After all, it’s a relatively straightforward business – processing, verifying and settling transactions for a fee. Indeed, Visa hardly gets its hands dirty. It’s never issued a credit or debit card, so it doesn’t have to deal with millions of customers, and it doesn’t lend any money, which means it bears no bad debt risk. Its clients are mainly banks – they provide Visa-branded cards (there are 3.3 billion of them) to their customers and the funds to cover their spending while taking the interest.

Two key strengths

But Visa has two key strengths: its global network, VisaNet; and its brand, one of the world’s most trusted. To build an alternative card payment brand would be very expensive and slow, and a challenge beyond disruptors. The cards must be widely acceptable and secure, operate seamlessly and offer cross-border reach. It’s easier to use what’s there and pay the fee. Day-to-day card usage has risen with the introduction of ‘contactless’ payment, together with growth in online and mobile spending. A bank that chose to meet these demands without offering established plastic or by partnering with an emerging payment network would have no customers.

This leaves the job squarely with the incumbents, making them an “oligopoly” – a few businesses dominating a market resistant to new entrants in which participants generally aren’t competing on price. This isn’t great news for consumers, but for investors, it’s the place to be. As John Authers notes in the Financial Times, the card processors are “as well-protected an oligopoly as it is possible to imagine”.

An impregnable oligopoly

Just looking at the digital disrupters makes this apparent. Apple Pay arrived with the usual fanfare but simply turns a phone into a card from Visa or a competitor. More recently, Apple launched its own credit card. Actually, it’s a Mastercard. As for PayPal, it carries out transactions but unless a bank account is linked to it directly or there’s a cash balance in the PayPal account, it needs to pay to use the Visa/Mastercard or American Express networks. Visa is also working with several fintechs. All told, most roads lead back to the big incumbents.

Meanwhile, a portion of Visa’s fees are linked to transaction amounts, which, reassuringly, means revenues are hedged against inflation and bolstered by overall GDP growth. And that’s before its crucial role in the ongoing expansion of e-commerce; the uptake in card usage in countries including emerging markets around the world; and an ongoing shift from cash to cards. Global non-cash transactions are expected to expand by an annual 13% over the next three years. Demand for payment processing will keep climbing and, as one fund manager put it, far from being pushed aside, Visa will remain a principal toll-booth through which ever-rising numbers of transactions must pass.

Visa: a heavyweight exploiting global trends

 

Visa share priceVisa has considerable advantages, notably being one of a couple of participants in a market that resists competition owing to its high barriers to entry. Warren Buffett calls this characteristic a defensive moat, like the stretch of water protecting a castle from marauders.

What he also said, however, was that when a deep and wide moat exists, investors can begin to lift the price at which they are prepared to pay for value. Visa currently trades on a forward price/earnings (p/e) ratio of around 26 and the yield is less than 1%. This buys investors an extremely compelling business model and outlook in which earnings could rise for approximately 20% a year near-term.

It has a strong record of growth and there are few clouds on the horizon. It is at the centre of major global trends: urbanisation, rising middle class populations, the switch from cash to card use, and the accelerating uptake and ease with e-commerce and mobile payments. The principal risks tend to be regulatory, system failure or outage, data protection, and security lapses.

There are few stocks that combine a strong track record, a healthy balance sheet, quality management, double-digit growth, limited threats from outsiders and a demonstrably effective competitive advantage. Visa is one company that brings all these traits together.

Two to three years out the p/e ratio falls to just under 20. However, the stock has rarely traded below 25 historically, and so while 12-month price targets tend to be around $180, a case can certainly be made for a price between $250-$300 over the next couple of years. That would surely put shareholders well ahead of the market as a whole in a company that should still be at the forefront of its industry.