A striking gap in the returns on Chinese index funds shows why you must be sure to know what you own.
China is set to become an even more significant force in global equity markets. By November, index provider MSCI will have increased the proportion of domestically listed Chinese stocks ("A-shares") in its emerging markets index from 0.71% to 3.3%, notes the Financial Times.
As a result, any funds that track the popular benchmark will have to buy more of the shares. Chinese stocks listed offshore in the US or Hong Kong already account for 31% of the index, so by the end of the year China's total weighting will be 34.3%. This is just one reason for this year's China market rally.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Yet for anyone considering investing in China, the latest Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook (by professors Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Dr Mike Staunton of the London Business School) has a useful warning know what you're buying. The researchers reviewed the performance of three key Chinese indices since 1993: FTSE China, MSCI China, and S&P China BMI.
All three, notes the yearbook, aim to measure the performance of Chinese stocks available for investment by foreign investors. Yet the returns were dramatically different. Over the period, the MSCI China returned just 1.1% a year. Yet the FTSE China index managed 10.3%, and the S&P BMI 7.4%.
That's a staggering gap. There's no great mystery to it there are several differences in calculation and categorisation that can account for the gap. For example, until 2013 the FTSE China index did not include certain Hong Kong-listed shares, while the MSCI China index excluded US-listed Chinese shares until 2015.
However, as an investor, if you'd been looking for a "China tracker" during this period, then you would have probably struggled to forecast (or even understand) the effect that their differing methodologies would have on your returns and choosing the wrong one would have cost you dear. The lesson is clear, and it'sone we've repeated over andover again here you always need to understand what you are investing in.The number of indices out there is now vast.
If you just want to buy UK shares, for example, you can probably rely on a plain vanilla FTSE All-Share tracker. But if you want to invest in specific emerging markets, or a tracker with a more exotic set of valuation criteria, then you have to look under the bonnet. If you can't understand what a tracker fund holds and why, or how those holdings might change over time, consider another route to investing in the sector. And if you're looking at China specifically, you might want to compare any passive funds you are considering with active alternatives.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
‘Inheritance tax insurance’ enquiries are soaring – but is it worth it?
MPs warn over Lifetime ISAs which could leave savers out of pocket
