We know that most fund managers fail to beat their underlying benchmarks consistently over the long run, partly because their fees are too high. Any number of studies prove this point. However, this isn't necessarily because managers are bad stock pickers other papers note that managers' "best ideas" tend to beat the market.
So what's the problem? An interesting new study might have the answer. Selling Fast and Buying Slow: Heuristics and Trading Performance of Institutional Investors, a 2018 paper from academics and researchers Klakow Akepanidtaworn, Rick Di Mascio, Alex Imas and Lawrence Schmidt, suggests asset managers are indeed generally good stock pickers. The authors looked at more than 750 portfolios between 2000 and 2016. On average, new buys beat both the market and a "counterfactual portfolio" where the researchers randomly added the money to an existing holding instead.
The problem arose when the managers decided to sell. Where a manager sold in a period around company news being released in other words, when there was a fundamental reason to sell their performance did not suffer. However, the same couldn't be said for other types of sale. Indeed, say the researchers, in most cases the average manager would have been better off by up to two percentage points a year by selling a stock completely at random.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
So what's going on? The researchers conclude that it's all about attention or a lack of it. Managers do their research and consider all the angles when they are buying. But when it comes to selling, they take shortcuts (or use "heuristics", in the behavioural jargon). One reason for this is that the selling decision often comes about not because the fundamentals of the stock have deteriorated, but because the manager needs to raise money. And when a manager is trying to pick a share to sell on that basis, he or she tends to be drawn to those that have either lost a lot of money or gained a lot while sitting in their portfolio. In effect, when managers sell without thinking, they cut their winning stocks too early, or end up crystallising losses that they should have trimmed a lot earlier.
This has implications for your own selling process (in short, consider it as carefully as your buying process). But it also suggests a few tips if you are looking for a good fund manager. First, look for low portfolio turnover the less selling a manager does, the fewer mistakes he or she can make. Secondly, look for a relatively small number of holdings. If managers are good at buying, you want maximum exposure to their best ideas rather than a portfolio full of also-rans that are just there to make up the numbers.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
Review: Eden Roc Cap Cana – fun, sun and golf in the Caribbean
Reeves delays cash ISA reform, but savers are not out of the woods yet
