Brexit can kicked down road

Very little will change in the two years after we leave, says Matthew Partridge.

888-Davis-634

David Davis and Michel Barnier: cliff-edge postponed
(Image credit: This content is subject to copyright.)

"The sighs of relief from No. 10 will be so loud they'll be heard in Brussels," says the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg. The EU's Michel Barnier and Brexit minister David Davis have agreed in principle a transition deal, "a period of 21 months where the two sides can work out the finer details of the relationship". Not only does this "represent progress", but the government also hopes it will provide "an insurance policy against businesses pulling up stumps and abandoning the UK as the uncertainty around Brexit threatens their ability to make plans".

"How devastating" this agreement must be for the Remain camp, says the Daily Mail. Brussels' concessions, such as allowing us to negotiate trade deals during the transition period, show that it has now realised that "both sides stand to suffer if a sensible agreement isn't reached". Indeed, there are already signs that "big corporations in member states have had enough" of the EU's "intransigence", with business leaders warning that the Commission's hardline stance could spark a trade war that "could cost countless jobs across the EU". Despite previous bluster, it now looks like we are set for a "smooth and amicable departure from the EU".

Not so fast, says The Daily Telegraph. The new deal seems to have "changed little"from the outline agreed before Christmas. "Most of the concessions appear to have been on the UK's part." Even the ability to negotiate new trade deals with third parties isn't that important as "no other country is going to want to reach an agreement with the UK until they know what our future trading relationship will be with the EU". The bottom line is that "the status quo will continue for 21 months after the official date for Brexit next March". Overall, the PM will have to work hard to convince "those Tory Brexiteers who fear transition makes the UK a vassal state".

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

It's all a long way from "the distant era of 2016" when Davis insisted "no transition at all would be needed", says The New Statesman's George Eaton. Indeed, before the vote Leave campaigners promised that Britain would be able simultaneously "to negotiate its divorce from the EU and a new trade deal". Since then the government has stopped threatening to end security co-operation and accepted a £35bn-£39bn divorce bill. It's also agreed to stay in the Common Fisheries Policy during the transition.

The trouble now, says Bloomberg's Emma Ross-Thomas, is that the transition, which was supposed to be "a period during which businesses and the government would have two years to prepare for a new regime", will now "be used to hash out the details" of this regime. That leaves very little time for Britain to prepare for life in January 2021. In short, this deal creates a "new cliff-edge", says David Allen Green in the Financial Times. There "is no reason to believe the UK will be any more prepared for... 31 December 2020 than it was for 29 March 2019".

Dr Matthew Partridge
Shares editor, MoneyWeek

Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.

He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.

Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.

As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.

Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri