Russians meddled in US elections

But Trump claims his campaign did nothing wrong. Emily Hohler reports.


Trump: why such extraordinary lengths to appease the Russians?
(Image credit: This content is subject to copyright.)

But Trump claims his campaign did nothing wrong. Emily Hohler reports.

The indictment names 13 Russian nationals, 12 of whom are linked to the Internet Research Agency, a "shadowy, Kremlin-connected outfit" alleged to have carried out extensive information warfare before, during and after the campaign, says Adrian Chen in The New Yorker. Conspirators, some posing as ordinary Americans, started posting divisive commentary on social networks designed to cause discord and discredit all candidates apart from Trump and Bernie Sanders.

While Trump may be correct in saying that the indictments do not accuse him of collusion, his unwillingness or inability to defend America against a Russian campaign to undermine our democracy suggests that he is either "totally compromised by the Russians", a "towering fool, or both", saysThomas Friedman in The New York Times.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Perhaps Trump's real-estate empire has taken large amounts of money from shady oligarchs linked to the Kremlin? Or Russian intelligence has a tape of Trump's "sexual misbehaviour" while in Moscow running the Miss Universe contest? How else can his "quiescence" or the "extraordinary lengths" to which he has gone to shutdown the Mueller investigation be explained? There is so much he could and should be doing to mount an effective cyber defence, as well as an offence against Putin, yet he refuses to act.

Social media must take some blame The "vital detail" of the Mueller indictments is that most of those involved with the Russian propaganda machine needed no recruitment: they recruited themselves, says Hugo Rifkind in The Times. The "most significant" actions of the protagonists were online, where they created Facebook groups that eventually contained hundreds of thousands of "completely real people".

We should worry about the Russian agents, but we should worry more "about how little they actually had to do".Quite, says Anne Applebaum in The Washington Post. Social-media companies "are not accidental victimsof Russia's information war. They are its tools." They bear some responsibility for the "growing polarisation in American life" that the Russians tried to exploit.

The Facebook algorithm is pushing all of us into "ever more partisan echochambers". At the same time, Facebook argues that it is not responsible because it is not a publisher and therefore not legally liable for any material that appears on its platform. This is nonsense. It "behaves in every other way like one". Something needs to be done.

Syria's war is spinning out of control

The seven-year war in Syria is entering "a new and even more dangerous phase", says Jonathan Marcus on BBC Online. At least 250 people were killed in this week's bombing by forces loyalto Syria's president Bashar al-Assad in eastern Ghouta, the rebel-held enclave outside Damascus.

Syria has become a "Hobbesian hell", says Roger Boyes in The Times. The war started as an uprising against Bashar al-Assad, but there are now a dozen wars being fought in the country: Turkey against the SyrianKurds, Iran against Israel, Saudi proxies against Qatari proxies, Shia against Sunni. Meanwhile, the US and Russia are "trying to avoid direct confrontation".

The complexityof the war's alliances could keep it going for years, even while the conflict that started it appears "headed towards a conclusion", sayBen Hubbard and Jugal Patel in The New York Times. Anti-government rebels have been pushed into a "few remaining bastions" and Islamic State has lost nearly all of the territory it controlled.

There isno one left to topple Assad. Yet his government forces are depleted, leaving him without enough troops to "clear and hold" the entire country. His foreign backers, Russia and Iran, are calling the shots.

But now other "dangerous international power plays" risk overshadowing the domestic battles, say Erika Solomon and Laura Pitel in the Financial Times. There's the Turkish offensive in northwestern Syria, which is controlled by the YPG, which Turkey views as a threat to its own national security. And earlier this month an Israeli jet was shot down following a missionover Syria against an Iraniantarget."Open conflict" with Israel could provide Trump with the excuse he "yearns for" for a showdown with Iran, says Simon Tisdallin The Guardian. The worry is that "something big, sooner or later, is going to blow".

Emily Hohler

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.