But Trump claims his campaign did nothing wrong. Emily Hohler reports.
The indictment names 13 Russian nationals, 12 of whom are linked to the Internet Research Agency, a "shadowy, Kremlin-connected outfit" alleged to have carried out extensive information warfare before, during and after the campaign, says Adrian Chen in The New Yorker. Conspirators, some posing as ordinary Americans, started posting divisive commentary on social networks designed to cause discord and discredit all candidates apart from Trump and Bernie Sanders.
While Trump may be correct in saying that the indictments do not accuse him of collusion, his unwillingness or inability to defend America against a Russian campaign to undermine our democracy suggests that he is either "totally compromised by the Russians", a "towering fool, or both", saysThomas Friedman in The New York Times.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Perhaps Trump's real-estate empire has taken large amounts of money from shady oligarchs linked to the Kremlin? Or Russian intelligence has a tape of Trump's "sexual misbehaviour" while in Moscow running the Miss Universe contest? How else can his "quiescence" or the "extraordinary lengths" to which he has gone to shutdown the Mueller investigation be explained? There is so much he could and should be doing to mount an effective cyber defence, as well as an offence against Putin, yet he refuses to act.
Social media must take some blame The "vital detail" of the Mueller indictments is that most of those involved with the Russian propaganda machine needed no recruitment: they recruited themselves, says Hugo Rifkind in The Times. The "most significant" actions of the protagonists were online, where they created Facebook groups that eventually contained hundreds of thousands of "completely real people".
We should worry about the Russian agents, but we should worry more "about how little they actually had to do".Quite, says Anne Applebaum in The Washington Post. Social-media companies "are not accidental victimsof Russia's information war. They are its tools." They bear some responsibility for the "growing polarisation in American life" that the Russians tried to exploit.
The Facebook algorithm is pushing all of us into "ever more partisan echochambers". At the same time, Facebook argues that it is not responsible because it is not a publisher and therefore not legally liable for any material that appears on its platform. This is nonsense. It "behaves in every other way like one". Something needs to be done.
Syria's war is spinning out of control
The seven-year war in Syria is entering "a new and even more dangerous phase", says Jonathan Marcus on BBC Online. At least 250 people were killed in this week's bombing by forces loyalto Syria's president Bashar al-Assad in eastern Ghouta, the rebel-held enclave outside Damascus.
Syria has become a "Hobbesian hell", says Roger Boyes in The Times. The war started as an uprising against Bashar al-Assad, but there are now a dozen wars being fought in the country: Turkey against the SyrianKurds, Iran against Israel, Saudi proxies against Qatari proxies, Shia against Sunni. Meanwhile, the US and Russia are "trying to avoid direct confrontation".
The complexityof the war's alliances could keep it going for years, even while the conflict that started it appears "headed towards a conclusion", sayBen Hubbard and Jugal Patel in The New York Times. Anti-government rebels have been pushed into a "few remaining bastions" and Islamic State has lost nearly all of the territory it controlled.
There isno one left to topple Assad. Yet his government forces are depleted, leaving him without enough troops to "clear and hold" the entire country. His foreign backers, Russia and Iran, are calling the shots.
But now other "dangerous international power plays" risk overshadowing the domestic battles, say Erika Solomon and Laura Pitel in the Financial Times. There's the Turkish offensive in northwestern Syria, which is controlled by the YPG, which Turkey views as a threat to its own national security. And earlier this month an Israeli jet was shot down following a missionover Syria against an Iraniantarget."Open conflict" with Israel could provide Trump with the excuse he "yearns for" for a showdown with Iran, says Simon Tisdallin The Guardian. The worry is that "something big, sooner or later, is going to blow".
Emily has extensive experience in the world of journalism. She has worked on MoneyWeek for more than 20 years as a former assistant editor and writer. Emily has previously worked on titles including The Times as a Deputy Features Editor, Commissioning Editor at The Independent Sunday Review, The Daily Telegraph, and she spent three years at women's lifestyle magazine Marie Claire as a features writer for three years, early on in her career.
On MoneyWeek, Emily’s coverage includes Brexit and global markets such as Russia and China. Aside from her writing, Emily is a Nutritional Therapist and she runs her own business called Root Branch Nutrition in Oxfordshire, where she offers consultations and workshops on nutrition and health.
Who is the richest person in the world?
The top five richest people in the world have a combined net worth of $825 billion. Who takes the crown for the richest person in the world?
By Vaishali Varu Published
Top 10 stocks with highest growth over past decade - from Nvidia, Microsoft to Netflix, which companies made you the most money?
We reveal the 10 global companies with the biggest returns since 2013. One firm has posted an astonishing 9,870% return, meaning a £1,000 investment would now be worth almost £82,000.
By Ruth Emery Published