The price/earnings ratio (p/e) is one of the simplest and most popular valuation measures in investment. To calculate it, you take a company's share price and divide it by the earnings per share. In effect, it shows how much investors are willing to pay for a given £1 or $1 of earnings from that company. A high p/e indicates that the share is highly valued usually because investors expect earnings to grow quickly while a low p/e suggests the stock is cheap.
But which earnings figure should you use? One option is the "trailing" earnings the most recent full-year profit figure. On the one hand, this has the benefit of being a known figure. On the other, there's no guarantee it will reflect future earnings. So forward p/e ratios where the "e" is based on analysts' forecasts for the year ahead (or even further forward) are often used instead of trailing earnings. These give you a view on how cheap or expensive a firm is compared to what analysts expect its earnings to be but clearly, these forecasts can be wrong.
So which p/e is best? Last year, Joachim Klement of the CFA Institute produced what he reckons is a definitive answer. He looked at four major stockmarket indices: the S&P 500 in the US, theFTSE 350 in the UK, the Euro Stoxx 300 in the eurozone, and the Nikkei 225 in Japan. For each market he took the 20% of stocks with the lowest p/es, and the 20% with the highest, then compared average returns going back monthly over 20 years. He did this for both trailing and forward p/es.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
To cut a long story short, Klement found that investing with the help of trailing p/es was far more effective than using forward p/es across all four major developed markets. Using trailing p/es, the least expensive stocks outperformed the most expensive by anything from 1.2% a year (in the US) to 10.1% (in the UK). Using forward p/es, the least expensive stocks still outperformed the dearest in the UK, Japan and the eurozone, but by a much lower margin than using trailing p/es. And in the US, the cheapest stocks by forward p/e actually did worse than the most expensive ones "in other words, relying on forward p/e ratios destroyed performance", as Klement puts it.
The fundamental problem, says Klement, is that analysts' earnings forecasts are overoptimistic on average by about 10% (although the figure is not consistent enough to be useful in "discounting" this optimism). As a result, even though they're not perfect, you are far better off using trailing earnings to find cheap stocks. In short, says Klement, "Never use forward p/e ratios. Ever."
