Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Is Bercow out of order for speaking out over Trump?
John Bercow has spoken up over Donald Trump's state visit, notes Matthew Partridge. But not everyone is amused.
(Image credit: This content is subject to copyright.)
John Bercow, the speaker of the House of Commons, "has thrown Donald Trump's state visit into further chaos", says Stephen Bush in the New Statesman. The US president will not be invited to address MPs and peers in Westminster Hall, or in the Royal Gallery, on his visit to the UK. Since the rules state that the speaker "must extend their invitation for either event to take place, the president will have to find another venue". Yet even if one was found, or Bercow changes his mind, there is a "real risk of empty chairs in the audience".
While Downing Street seems happy "to turn Britain into a client state of Trump's America... Bercow spoke for Britain", claims Owen Jones in The Guardian. The speaker has made "commendable efforts to combat racism and sexism in politics". To have avoided speaking out on Trump "would have been hypocritical". A state visit to the UK, let alone the privilege of addressing parliament, is "an honour some presidents have never received".
Bercow "has done much to empower backbench MPs and ensure the Commons is the cockpit of British democracy", says Sebastian Payne in the Financial Times. But his latest move is "hypocritical and unwise". Bercow "did not object to China's President Xi Jinping, the emir of Kuwait, or President Yudhoyono of Indonesia speaking in the Palace of Westminster". More importantly, his role "is supposed to be a neutral and non-partisan" one. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the situation, Bercow "has no business intervening on foreign policy".
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Yet he has a point, says Janet Daley in The Daily Telegraph. "Brexit meant Brexit", but it "doesn't mean Trump". Prime Minister Theresa May "has gone a long way to persuading everybody that she has real influence over the president". But how much is this worth "from a man whose behaviour is so erratic and inappropriate for high office"? Given that Britain is about to leave the European Union, "more than ever, at this point in its history, the UK cannot afford to be portrayed as defending the indefensible".
Bercow's statement "reflects a profound decay in the British public's enthusiasm for the special relationship'", says Eric Levitz in New York Magazine. And the British aren't alone. "Two weeks into the Trump presidency, a leading German newspaper has called on all freedom-loving peoples to mobilise against the US", while "a senior cabinet minister in the Australian government has coined the phrase normal Trump Tantrum'". It seems that "Trump is well on his way to remaking America in his own image".
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
