Life as a 'precarian' – it’s not as bad a gig as you might think
'Precarians' – workers on precarious contracts – have none of the protections that traditional employees have. But evidence suggests they are doing better than the average worker, says Matthew Lynn.
The "gig economy", the phrase used to describe the rapid growth of self-employment and micro-businesses, has been by far the fastest-growing sector of the economy in the past five years, and a huge new source of growth.
By last year, self-employment in the UK had hit an all-time high, with 4.6 million people working for themselves, according to the Office for National Statistics. They now account for 15% of the labour force, compared to 13% before the crash of 2008. If you add in micro-businesses that is, companies that employ fewer than nine people, and which often amount to a few freelancers banding together the totals would be even higher.
There are some signs that the trend is levelling off, as big companies start hiring more people as the economy recovers. But countering that is the rapid rise of the new breed of sharing apps, of which cab-hailing firm Uber and room-sharing service Airbnb are the most visible. Airbnb is now running what it is now in some ways the biggest hotel chain in the world, with fewer than 2,000 employees the likes of Holiday Inn might employ that number at just three or four sites.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
The rising "precariat" those making a living from doing short-term "gigs" on precarious contracts rather than from secure jobs have none of the protections that traditional employers offer, and that unions and the Labour Party have fought for. They don't get parental leave, or sick pay, or paid holidays, and they can't take themselves to an employment tribunal if their workflow suddenly dries up or they haven't got enough cash to pay themselves at the end of the month.
Many others, and not least some big companies, hoping to strangle competition with red tape, are arguing that Uber and Airbnb should be made to treat their drivers and home-owners as staff, with all the costs and employment rights that entails. In the US, there are court cases underway trying to re-define sharers as staff. Across the developed world, there are efforts to make the self-employed much more like traditional workers. In fairness, there is something to be said for this.
If self-employment offered the same kind of benefits as a staff job, then more people might make the transition. It can be a demanding lifestyle, without much in the way of perks. If people working for themselves got maternity leave, for example, more women might try it. The trouble is, in many more cases, people in the gig economy have actually fled the dead hand of excessive regulation.
Busting the self-employed myths
True, there are plenty of low-paid self-employed people cleaning houses or delivering parcels but there are also lots of well-paid professionals. The gig economy hasn't made them worse off. A report on Uber drivers shows they were making a lot more than old-style cab drivers. In New York, for example, they were making $30 an hour, compared to $15 for taxi drivers.
The "social protection" some of the left want to offer them will have to be paid for somehow. If they were to be offered holiday pay and parental leave, for example, then presumably they would have to face higher taxes and national insurance charges. But they may not want that. Some might want three or four months off a year, and others may work 24-7 for 12 months of the year but that is their choice. In fact, self-employment is rising because it generally offers higher pay and better conditions than traditional employment, and more flexibility as well.
Funnily enough France probably the most over-protected labour market in the world also has the fastest-rising number of micro-businesses according to Eurostat statistics. It is the one way of escaping deadening state regulation only freelancers in France have any sort of control over their working lives. The last thing the gig economy needs is a raft of intrusive and cumbersome employment regulations. In reality, the best thing we could do is deregulate it even further.
We could raise VAT thresholds so the self-employed could push their sales up without the bother of having to register. Or we could allow them to take on one member of staff, without having to pay tax and national insurance for them, or be burdened down by employment law that would create a huge number of jobs as well as making their life easier. After all, if the self-employed earn much more than the average salary, then that can only be because their productivity is higher. If we had even more of them then the whole country would be a lot richer and far richer than if they were all taking time off on paid leave.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg, and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
He has written books on finance and financial topics, including Bust: Greece, The Euro and The Sovereign Debt Crisis and The Long Depression: The Slump of 2008 to 2031. Matthew is also the author of the Death Force series of military thrillers and the founder of Lume Books, an independent publisher.
Warning as Brits face €6,900 fine if they fail to follow new Spanish travel insurance rule
Rachel Reeves to announce permanent 95% mortgage guarantee scheme
