Bad news for savers – the financial repression is set to continue
The Bank of England seems intent on holding down interest rates for longer. That's terrible news for savers. So, what's going on, and what can you do about it? John Stepek explains.
Sterling took a pounding yesterday.
The pound slid after the Bank of England kept interest rates on hold yet again. It fell from as high as near $1.54 to just below $1.52 this morning.
The rate freeze was entirely expected of course. But what was more surprising was the accompanying inflation report.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It now looks as though despite Britain's apparently improving economy the Bank could be keeping rates on hold for perhaps the whole of next year.
More misery for savers ahead then.
The Bank of England and the currency Cold War
There are plenty of problems and general weirdnesses' about our underlying economy. The usual dysfunctional property market. The fact that the Bank of England owns a huge chunk of government debt.
But regardless of how healthy or otherwise you think the UK economy really is, it's very hard to make the argument that it's in intensive care, or in an emergency situation right at this precise moment.
Which begs the question why do we still have an emergency interest rate policy?
Put simply, central bankers have got pretty lucky. The crashing oil price is actually hugely stimulatory for an economy like the UK's. But at the same time, it keeps the inflation figures down. So it provides plenty of cover for inaction.
It's increasingly clear that central bankers actively want to be behind the curve'. We've heard a lot of theoretical talk in recent years about how central banks should raise their inflation targets to get out of the economic slump.
In other words, they should be willing to tolerate more inflation (something closer to 4%, say, rather than 2%) to make up for the years when inflation was weak.
Now as I said, this is all in the realms of academic theory rather than official policy at the moment. But I wouldn't be at all surprised if this is the broad game plan that central banks are now unofficially following. It's always worth remembering the one thing that really terrifies the likes of Janet Yellen or Mark Carney the spectre of Japan.
They'll do anything to avoid ending up in Japan's situation. And as far as they're concerned, Japan's basic problem (not to mention the Great Depression of the 1930s) boiled down to overly tight monetary policy.
It's important to keep this in mind. Central banks certainly in the US and the UK will very strongly err on the side of caution. They would rather make an error of omission (failing to raise rates in good time to prevent inflation) than one of commission (being too early with raising rates).
This is the main reason why I still don't expect the Fed to raise rates next month, despite the rapid back-pedalling we've seen in recent weeks. In fact, I suspect that Yellen is praying for a weak US payrolls report today in order to make justifying a continued hold at 0% easier.
It's also pretty clear that central banks the world over are monitoring their currencies closely. We're engaged in a currency Cold War'. There's no outright targeting of any given exchange rate. That would be politically unacceptable.
But the last thing the Bank of England wants is to be seen as being the only developed world central bank that's close to raising interest rates. Manufacturers are already feeling the bite of the pound's strength against the euro.
The financial repression will continue until morale improves
This is one reason why we've been talking about income a lot recently. In a world that promises ongoing financial repression as far as the eye can see, you need to know how to generate it.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
How to invest in nuclear power
We need nuclear power to go green, says Dominic Frisby. But there is a better option than huge power stations
By Dominic Frisby Published
-
Chase slashes its easy-access savings rate – is it time to switch?
The Chase easy-access savings account has proved popular with savers thanks to its competitive rate and bonus deals. But, as the rate has dropped, has it lost its charm?
By Katie Williams Published