Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
India's film industry, AKA “Bollywood”, is huge. Every year, it churns out three times the number of films made in Hollywood. And in 2012, it sold 2.6 billion cinema tickets, compared with Hollywood's 1.4 billion – quite a feat, given that India has just 13,000 cinema screens, compared with America's 40,000.
True, the box office take is dwarfed by Hollywood's – just $1.6bn compared to $10.8bn. But the average Bollywood blockbuster costs just $1.5m to make. In Hollywood, it would set you back up to $50m.
And it all started on this day in 1912 with the release at the Coronation Cinematograph in Mumbai of Dadasaheb Torne's, Shree Pundalik, the first film made in India. It was a 22-minute long silent movie, a recording of the popular Marathi play Pundalik.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Torne was just 21 or 22 when he convinced his friend to put up the money for the film and camera. Unfortunately, they didn't know how to use the camera, so the British camera company sent a man known only as “Johnson” out to do it for them.
However, the film's role in Indian cinema is still disputed. Many people still think the honour of the first Indian film should go to Dadasaheb Phalke's Raja Harishchandra, which premiered a year later.
For many purists, the fact that Torne's movie had a British cameraman and the film was processed in London disqualifies it from being a truly Indian' film. Other objections are that, at only 22 minutes long, the film is too short to be a feature film; and that effectively it is just a play that was filmed.
In 2013, the dispute made its way to the High Court of Bombay, when Torne's descendants filed a “public interest litigation” to get their father's contribution to Indian cinema fully recognised.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Average UK house price reaches £300,000 for first time, Halifax saysWhile the average house price has topped £300k, regional disparities still remain, Halifax finds.
-
Barings Emerging Europe trust bounces back from Russia woesBarings Emerging Europe trust has added the Middle East and Africa to its mandate, delivering a strong recovery, says Max King