Why take Blair’s tainted money?

Tony Blair’s pledge of £1,000 to each of the 106 candidates in Labour’s main battleground seats has stirred controversy.

Emily Hohler
By
published
in Features

It didn't take long for Tony Blair's pledge of £1,000 to each of the 106 candidates in Labour's main battleground seats to stir controversy, says Jim Pickard in the Financial Times.

While a spokesman said the party was "delighted" with the backing, the reality is that their former leader's "jet-setting lifestyle is at odds with Labour's increasingly leftwing... campaign... focusing on voters' cost of living crisis'". So far two candidates have refused the money. Alistair Campbell, Blair's former-spin doctor, responded by accusing them of "attention-seeking".

There's certainly good reason for candidates to see the cash as "tainted", as Nigel Morris puts it in The Independent. Blair's decision to take Britain into the Iraq war and his activities since leaving Number 10 still arouse anger.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Rhodri Glyn Thomas of Plaid Cymru told the Daily Mail that Blair had amassed his fortune by "doing the bidding of the global banks that created the longest-lasting recession since records began He has worked for multinational energy companies, who have rigged the energy market created by his Labour government, resulting in inflated energy costs for consumers; and global dictators guilty of human rights abuses".

That cynicism extends even to Blair's diplomatic role as Middle East envoy, which has been "no more than a ticket to making ever more millions" for "Blair Inc", says Alex Brummer, the Daily Mail's City editor.

Given that, it's hard to see why Labour would want his donations, concludes Dan Hodges in The Daily Telegraph. Ed Miliband's strategy is to reach out to three groups: "former Labour voters who stopped voting Labour because they hate... Blair, former Lib Dems who wouldn't have dreamt of voting Labour because they hated... Blair", and students and first-time voters who only vaguely remember Blair, but hate him because they think it's cool.

So why is Labour "broadcasting the fact" that he's bankrolling their campaign? It's not even as if £1,000 will go very far. "Each of those candidates is about to spend every hour between now and polling day being chased around by angry people in ill-fitting multicoloured jumpers who will shout, Did you take Blair's blood money!? Did you??!!!!'"

Emily Hohler
Emily Hohler
Politics editor

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.

Latest