Is Cameron too frit for TV debates?

David Cameron's threatened no-show at the TV debates looks like an admission of defeat.

Emily Hohler
By
published
in Features

The leaders of Labour, the Liberal Democrats and Ukip wroteto David Cameron saying they will go ahead with television debates without him if he refuses to take part and challenged broadcasters to provide an empty chair to represent him, says Rowena Mason in The Guardian.

Cameron insists that he does want to take part, but that he won't unless the Green Party leader, Natalie Bennett, is included, because the party is polling above the Lib Dems.

That's because "Tory strategists know they are vulnerable to losing votes to Ukip and believe that including the Greens would provide a counterbalance by peeling off support from Labour", says Laura Pitel in The Times.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Although Cameron out-polls Ed Miliband on leadership ratings, Tories fear that low expectations for Miliband could result in a surprise win if he delivers a solid performance. Set against that, Tory grandee Lord Tebbit warned that a no-show risks making Cameron seem "frit", as well being seen as an admission that he "bungled it" in the 2010 debates.

The TV debates were central to Cameron's modernising act in 2010 and his "reverse ferret" is an attempt to "put a pillow over the face of democracy", says Adam Boulton in The Sunday Times. "If you believe that the voters should be informed as much as possible about the policies and character of people who want to be given power, then TV debates are the best way to do that."

Cameron's insistence on including the Greens "is foot-dragging of comic proportion that not even his close family believes', according to Labour sources". He is also threatening to "duck out of the proposed head-to-head with Miliband and a 2010-style Con-Lab-Lib clash on the BBC".

Nor has he replied to an invitation to a digital debate run by The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and YouTube, when the Greens can be present, says James Kirkup in The Daily Telegraph.

Cameron is becoming "dangerously exposed to the perception that when he says he wants to take part, he does not mean it" and that he's afraid of voters but won't admit it. "Time to step up, prime minister, before those chicken feathers start to stick."

Emily Hohler
Emily Hohler
Politics editor

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.

Latest