Since the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species in 1859, scientists had been desperate to find the ‘missing link’ that would prove that humans evolved from an ape-like ancestor
Then, in 1912, someone claimed to have found it in a gravel pit in Sussex.
Charles Dawson, a local solicitor and amateur fossil hunter, wrote to Arthur Smith Woodward at the Natural History Museum saying he had found pieces of a “human-like” skull. Smith Woodward rushed south, and joined the hunt. Soon, Dawson uncovered fragments of a jawbone. Smith Woodward used all the pieces to come up with a reconstruction of the skull , which combined an ape-like skull and jaw with teeth that looked decidedly human.
And so, on 18 December, Smith Woodward announced the discovery to a meeting of the Geological Society. He claimed eoanthropus dawsoni – as he dubbed it – was a 500,000 year-old predecessor of modern humans. The announcement caused a sensation.
But as time went on, more human fossils were found in other areas of the world, and none were quite like the Piltdown find. Scientists began to doubt their authenticity.
In the late 1940s tests were performed on the teeth; they were found to be no more than 50,000 years old.
Then, the skull and jaw were investigated more thoroughly, and found to come from two different animals – one a human, and the other an orang utan. They also determined that the finds had been artificially aged.
In 1953, ‘Piltdown Man’ was officially declared a fake – a fake that had fooled scientists for 40 years. Nobody quite knows how did it or why. There are a few people in the frame, but the fact that no further evidence of the finds came after Charles Dawson’s death in 1916, casts him firmly in the role of prime suspect.
That and his long record of scientific hoaxes.