Phones go dead at Phones4U

The blame game has begun after the mobile phone retailer fell into administration.

Andrew Van Sickle's avatar
By
published
in Features

Mobile phone chain Phones4U collapsed into administration this week. Its major suppliers had abandoned it in recent months, with EE the last to go.

Having lost the sources for almost all of its sales, and with debts worth £635m (compared to operating earnings of £105m in 2013), the company's creditors pulled the plug, leaving almost 6,000 jobs at risk.

Its owners, private-equity group BC Partners, blamed the mobile operators for the firm's demise, while they blamed BC Partners for milking the business too hard. Founder John Caudwell, who sold to private equity in 2011, blamed both.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

What the commentators said

The operators' view of events looks more credible, reckoned Nils Pratley on Theguardian.com. Phones4U said that Vodafone and EE's decisions to stop supplying it had come as a shock. "Really?" Both Three and O2 had already stopped allowing the retailer to sell its products.

"It was hardly beyond the realms of possibility that the other big operators would follow." Indeed, Vodafone "has been banging on for at least a year" about how it wants to sell more through its own shops and website.

Operators' profit margins have been squeezed as regulators crack down on the fees they can charge, noted Christopher Williams in The Daily Telegraph. So it's no surprise they have been "eyeing the share of handset and contract sales taken by middlemen such as Phones4U".

But while the writing was on the wall, BG's financial engineering didn't help. It took out a £200m dividend by piling on debt. This meant it got back the equity it had put into the group and then some but the higher gearing meant higher debt repayments. These made it harder to offer the likes of Vodafone appealing terms.

Caudwell shares some of the blame, said Chris Blackhurst in The Independent. Private equity's top priority is "a quick return and a smart exit". Once they had got their hands on Phones4U, it was unlikely ever to become "a growing, booming business with a market-leading, long-term future".

The upshot, for now, is that rival "Carphone is sitting pretty". But if the networks stick to wanting to do their own selling, how long will this last?

Andrew Van Sickle
Andrew Van Sickle
Editor, MoneyWeek

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.

Latest